BL
Price
$56.64
Change
+$0.11 (+0.19%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.99B
44 days until earnings call
MGPPF
Price
$7.00
Change
-$0.05 (-0.71%)
Updated
Feb 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.1B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BL vs MGPPF

Header iconBL vs MGPPF Comparison
Open Charts BL vs MGPPFBanner chart's image
BlackLine
Price$56.64
Change+$0.11 (+0.19%)
Volume$1.57M
Capitalization3.99B
Megaport
Price$7.00
Change-$0.05 (-0.71%)
Volume$120
Capitalization1.1B
BL vs MGPPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BL vs. MGPPF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BL is a Buy and MGPPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (BL: $56.64 vs. MGPPF: $7.00)
Brand notoriety: BL and MGPPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BL: 213% vs. MGPPF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BL: $3.99B vs. MGPPF: $1.1B
BL [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.99B. MGPPF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $1.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGPPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGPPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BL is a better buy in the long-term than MGPPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BL (@Packaged Software) experienced а +3.40% price change this week, while MGPPF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

BL is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.15% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BL($3.99B) has a higher market cap than MGPPF($1.1B). MGPPF YTD gains are higher at: 52.599 vs. BL (-6.781). BL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 117M vs. MGPPF (1.88M). BL has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. MGPPF (82.5M). MGPPF has less debt than BL: MGPPF (27.3M) vs BL (1.41B). BL has higher revenues than MGPPF: BL (590M) vs MGPPF (106M).
BLMGPPFBL / MGPPF
Capitalization3.99B1.1B362%
EBITDA117M1.88M6,220%
Gain YTD-6.78152.599-13%
P/E Ratio78.96N/A-
Revenue590M106M557%
Total Cash1.2B82.5M1,459%
Total Debt1.41B27.3M5,165%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BL vs MGPPF: Fundamental Ratings
BL
MGPPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7850
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
2185
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5050
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5249
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BL's Valuation (79) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as MGPPF (87) in the null industry. This means that BL’s stock grew similarly to MGPPF’s over the last 12 months.

BL's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as MGPPF (100) in the null industry. This means that BL’s stock grew similarly to MGPPF’s over the last 12 months.

BL's SMR Rating (21) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGPPF (85) in the null industry. This means that BL’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGPPF’s over the last 12 months.

BL's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as MGPPF (50) in the null industry. This means that BL’s stock grew similarly to MGPPF’s over the last 12 months.

MGPPF's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as BL (52) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that MGPPF’s stock grew similarly to BL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLMGPPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
73%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRBCX199.391.67
+0.84%
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth
JIGRX52.270.27
+0.52%
Janus Henderson Overseas S
RTDYX16.030.08
+0.50%
Russell Inv Multifactor US Equity Y
EPLCX22.380.05
+0.22%
NYLI Epoch U.S. Equity Yield Class I
RSIYX17.010.02
+0.12%
Victory RS Investors Y

BL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BL has been loosely correlated with SMWB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BL jumps, then SMWB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BL
1D Price
Change %
BL100%
+0.19%
SMWB - BL
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.81%
TDC - BL
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
RPD - BL
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.90%
WK - BL
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
ADSK - BL
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
More

MGPPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGPPF has been loosely correlated with CMPVF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MGPPF jumps, then CMPVF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGPPF
1D Price
Change %
MGPPF100%
N/A
CMPVF - MGPPF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AISP - MGPPF
37%
Loosely correlated
-3.66%
BL - MGPPF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
CMPUY - MGPPF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DAVE - MGPPF
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.72%
More