BKUCF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
9.98M
GRDAF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

BKUCF vs GRDAF

Header iconBKUCF vs GRDAF Comparison
Open Charts BKUCF vs GRDAFBanner chart's image
Blue Sky Uranium
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$24.5K
Capitalization9.98M
Grounded Lithium
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.1K
CapitalizationN/A
BKUCF vs GRDAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BKUCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRDAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKUCF vs. GRDAF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKUCF is a Hold and GRDAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BKUCF: $0.04 vs. GRDAF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: BKUCF and GRDAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKUCF: 7% vs. GRDAF: 3%
Market capitalization -- BKUCF: $9.98M vs. GRDAF: $0
BKUCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $9.98M. GRDAF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKUCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGRDAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BKUCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GRDAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRDAF is a better buy in the long-term than BKUCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BKUCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRDAF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BKUCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GRDAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BKUCF is a better buy in the short-term than GRDAF.

Price Growth

BKUCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -2.03% price change this week, while GRDAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +2.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRDAF YTD gains are higher at: -31.737 vs. BKUCF (-38.108).
BKUCFGRDAFBKUCF / GRDAF
Capitalization9.98MN/A-
EBITDA-4.68MN/A-
Gain YTD-38.108-31.737120%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash929KN/A-
Total Debt1.4MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKUCF vs GRDAF: Fundamental Ratings
BKUCF
GRDAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10097
SMR RATING
1..100
10094
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6357
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GRDAF's Valuation (60) in the null industry is in the same range as BKUCF (84). This means that GRDAF’s stock grew similarly to BKUCF’s over the last 12 months.

GRDAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as BKUCF (100). This means that GRDAF’s stock grew similarly to BKUCF’s over the last 12 months.

GRDAF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as BKUCF (100). This means that GRDAF’s stock grew similarly to BKUCF’s over the last 12 months.

GRDAF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as BKUCF (63). This means that GRDAF’s stock grew similarly to BKUCF’s over the last 12 months.

GRDAF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BKUCF (100). This means that GRDAF’s stock grew similarly to BKUCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKUCFGRDAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BKUCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRDAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FGPR10.451.87
+21.79%
Ferrellgas Partners, L.P.
SBHGF36.500.28
+0.77%
SBI Holdings, Inc.
MOAEY0.31N/A
N/A
Mongolia Energy Corp., Ltd.
CHRUF5.35N/A
N/A
CHORUS LTD.
OODH0.28-0.03
-9.68%
Orion Diversified Holding Co Inc.

BKUCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BKUCF and FUUFF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BKUCF and FUUFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKUCF
1D Price
Change %
BKUCF100%
-2.78%
FUUFF - BKUCF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
ISOU - BKUCF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
SRUUF - BKUCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.19%
BNNLF - BKUCF
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.43%
GRDAF - BKUCF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
More

GRDAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRDAF and MKNGF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRDAF and MKNGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRDAF
1D Price
Change %
GRDAF100%
-0.87%
MKNGF - GRDAF
30%
Poorly correlated
+36.87%
ABRMF - GRDAF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
REMRF - GRDAF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
BKUCF - GRDAF
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.78%
BRYGF - GRDAF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More