BKU
Price
$38.04
Change
+$0.43 (+1.14%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.04B
17 days until earnings call
FNWB
Price
$8.13
Change
-$0.01 (-0.12%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
149.01M
17 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BKU vs FNWB

Header iconBKU vs FNWB Comparison
Open Charts BKU vs FNWBBanner chart's image
Bankunited
Price$38.04
Change+$0.43 (+1.14%)
Volume$530.59K
Capitalization2.04B
First Northwest Ban
Price$8.13
Change-$0.01 (-0.12%)
Volume$2.22K
Capitalization149.01M
BKU vs FNWB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BKU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKU vs. FNWB commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKU is a Buy and FNWB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BKU: $38.04 vs. FNWB: $8.13)
Brand notoriety: BKU and FNWB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKU: 67% vs. FNWB: 12%
Market capitalization -- BKU: $2.04B vs. FNWB: $149.01M
BKU [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.04B. FNWB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $149.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFNWB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BKU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FNWB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BKU is a better buy in the long-term than FNWB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BKU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNWB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BKU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FNWB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNWB is a better buy in the short-term than BKU.

Price Growth

BKU (@Regional Banks) experienced а +7.12% price change this week, while FNWB (@Regional Banks) price change was +7.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

BKU is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

FNWB is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKU($2.04B) has a higher market cap than FNWB($149M). FNWB has higher P/E ratio than BKU: FNWB (60.69) vs BKU (11.53). BKU YTD gains are higher at: 1.469 vs. FNWB (-19.253). FNWB has less debt than BKU: FNWB (321M) vs BKU (5.82B). BKU has higher revenues than FNWB: BKU (961M) vs FNWB (65.5M).
BKUFNWBBKU / FNWB
Capitalization2.04B149M1,370%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.469-19.253-8%
P/E Ratio11.5360.6919%
Revenue961M65.5M1,467%
Total CashN/A20.6M-
Total Debt5.82B321M1,814%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKU vs FNWB: Fundamental Ratings
BKU
FNWB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
56100
SMR RATING
1..100
1189
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4482
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
652
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNWB's Valuation (32) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BKU (44) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FNWB’s stock grew similarly to BKU’s over the last 12 months.

BKU's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNWB (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BKU’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

BKU's SMR Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNWB (89) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BKU’s stock grew significantly faster than FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

BKU's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNWB (82) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BKU’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

FNWB's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BKU (65) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FNWB’s stock grew somewhat faster than BKU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKUFNWB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BKU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HCHDF3.730.23
+6.57%
Hochschild Mining PLC
ICPVF1.62N/A
N/A
Dyno Nobel Ltd
FCSUF0.12N/A
N/A
Focus Minerals Ltd.
DWAHY33.97-0.16
-0.47%
Daiwa House Industry Co. Ltd.
TCBPY0.28-0.06
-17.69%
TC BioPharm (Holdings) plc

BKU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKU has been closely correlated with ABCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BKU jumps, then ABCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKU
1D Price
Change %
BKU100%
+1.14%
ABCB - BKU
90%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
SNV - BKU
90%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
HWC - BKU
90%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
PNFP - BKU
89%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
ONB - BKU
89%
Closely correlated
+1.16%
More

FNWB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNWB has been loosely correlated with ISTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNWB jumps, then ISTR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNWB
1D Price
Change %
FNWB100%
-0.12%
ISTR - FNWB
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.80%
INDB - FNWB
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.19%
AX - FNWB
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
EBMT - FNWB
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
BKU - FNWB
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
More