BKRIF
Price
$14.74
Change
+$0.74 (+5.29%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
11.18B
UNCFF
Price
$72.35
Change
-$1.65 (-2.23%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
45.77B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BKRIF vs UNCFF

Header iconBKRIF vs UNCFF Comparison
Open Charts BKRIF vs UNCFFBanner chart's image
Bank Ireland Group
Price$14.74
Change+$0.74 (+5.29%)
Volume$2.54K
Capitalization11.18B
UniCredito Spa
Price$72.35
Change-$1.65 (-2.23%)
Volume$2.91K
Capitalization45.77B
BKRIF vs UNCFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BKRIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKRIF vs. UNCFF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKRIF is a StrongBuy and UNCFF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BKRIF: $14.74 vs. UNCFF: $72.35)
Brand notoriety: BKRIF and UNCFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKRIF: 73% vs. UNCFF: 42%
Market capitalization -- BKRIF: $11.18B vs. UNCFF: $45.77B
BKRIF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $11.18B. UNCFF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $45.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKRIF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUNCFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BKRIF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • UNCFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BKRIF and UNCFF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BKRIF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNCFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BKRIF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UNCFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BKRIF and UNCFF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BKRIF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.67% price change this week, while UNCFF (@Regional Banks) price change was +6.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UNCFF($45.8B) has a higher market cap than BKRIF($11.2B). BKRIF has higher P/E ratio than UNCFF: BKRIF (7.62) vs UNCFF (5.29). UNCFF YTD gains are higher at: 80.803 vs. BKRIF (64.693). BKRIF has less debt than UNCFF: BKRIF (12.4B) vs UNCFF (93B). UNCFF has higher revenues than BKRIF: UNCFF (23.1B) vs BKRIF (3.26B).
BKRIFUNCFFBKRIF / UNCFF
Capitalization11.2B45.8B24%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD64.69380.80380%
P/E Ratio7.625.29144%
Revenue3.26B23.1B14%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt12.4B93B13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKRIF vs UNCFF: Fundamental Ratings
BKRIF
UNCFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
54
SMR RATING
1..100
73
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4239
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3237
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UNCFF's Valuation (81) in the null industry is in the same range as BKRIF (85). This means that UNCFF’s stock grew similarly to BKRIF’s over the last 12 months.

UNCFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as BKRIF (5). This means that UNCFF’s stock grew similarly to BKRIF’s over the last 12 months.

UNCFF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as BKRIF (7). This means that UNCFF’s stock grew similarly to BKRIF’s over the last 12 months.

UNCFF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as BKRIF (42). This means that UNCFF’s stock grew similarly to BKRIF’s over the last 12 months.

BKRIF's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as UNCFF (37). This means that BKRIF’s stock grew similarly to UNCFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKRIFUNCFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BKRIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TAL9.990.17
+1.78%
TAL Education Group
WS31.830.21
+0.66%
Worthington Steel
OAKUU11.85N/A
N/A
Oak Woods Acquisition Corp
PKE17.61-0.19
-1.07%
Park Aerospace Corp
LRE1.84-0.12
-6.12%
Lead Real Estate Co Ltd

BKRIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BKRIF and SCGLY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BKRIF and SCGLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKRIF
1D Price
Change %
BKRIF100%
N/A
SCGLY - BKRIF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
KBCSY - BKRIF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
UNCFF - BKRIF
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.23%
ISNPY - BKRIF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
CRARY - BKRIF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
More

UNCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNCFF has been loosely correlated with ISNPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNCFF jumps, then ISNPY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNCFF
1D Price
Change %
UNCFF100%
-2.23%
ISNPY - UNCFF
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
CRZBY - UNCFF
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
MDIBY - UNCFF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
BKRIF - UNCFF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPHLF - UNCFF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More