BKQNY
Price
$9.00
Change
-$0.38 (-4.05%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Capitalization
3.04B
FLEW
Price
$53.00
Change
-$2.26 (-4.09%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Capitalization
15.8M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BKQNY vs FLEW

Header iconBKQNY vs FLEW Comparison
Open Charts BKQNY vs FLEWBanner chart's image
Bank of Queensland
Price$9.00
Change-$0.38 (-4.05%)
Volume$982
Capitalization3.04B
Fleetwood Bank
Price$53.00
Change-$2.26 (-4.09%)
Volume$25
Capitalization15.8M
BKQNY vs FLEW Comparison Chart in %
BKQNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLEW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKQNY vs. FLEW commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKQNY is a Hold and FLEW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BKQNY: $9.00 vs. FLEW: $53.00)
Brand notoriety: BKQNY and FLEW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKQNY: 235% vs. FLEW: 12%
Market capitalization -- BKQNY: $3.05B vs. FLEW: $15.8M
BKQNY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.05B. FLEW’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $15.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $175.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKQNY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFLEW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BKQNY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FLEW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BKQNY is a better buy in the long-term than FLEW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BKQNY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLEW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BKQNY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FLEW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLEW is a better buy in the short-term than BKQNY.

Price Growth

BKQNY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.00% price change this week, while FLEW (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKQNY($3.04B) has a higher market cap than FLEW($15.8M). BKQNY has higher P/E ratio than FLEW: BKQNY (34.89) vs FLEW (11.18). BKQNY YTD gains are higher at: 16.760 vs. FLEW (-0.935). BKQNY has higher revenues than FLEW: BKQNY (1.6B) vs FLEW (11.7M).
BKQNYFLEWBKQNY / FLEW
Capitalization3.04B15.8M19,259%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.760-0.935-1,793%
P/E Ratio34.8911.18312%
Revenue1.6B11.7M13,701%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKQNY vs FLEW: Fundamental Ratings
BKQNY
FLEW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8992
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
64100
SMR RATING
1..100
1179
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5960
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
768
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLEW's Valuation (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BKQNY (87). This means that FLEW’s stock grew significantly faster than BKQNY’s over the last 12 months.

BKQNY's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLEW (100). This means that BKQNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLEW’s over the last 12 months.

BKQNY's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLEW (79). This means that BKQNY’s stock grew significantly faster than FLEW’s over the last 12 months.

BKQNY's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as FLEW (60). This means that BKQNY’s stock grew similarly to FLEW’s over the last 12 months.

BKQNY's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLEW (68). This means that BKQNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLEW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKQNYFLEW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
27%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BKQNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLEW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFDMX38.090.23
+0.61%
DF Dent Midcap Growth Investor
USBNX27.720.15
+0.54%
Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Ord
GTFPX32.620.14
+0.43%
Goldman Sachs International Eq ESG P
JAVTX85.730.04
+0.05%
Janus Henderson Venture T
GBLCX41.12-0.05
-0.12%
American Funds Global Balanced C

BKQNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKQNY has been loosely correlated with BKAHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BKQNY jumps, then BKAHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKQNY
1D Price
Change %
BKQNY100%
N/A
BKAHF - BKQNY
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HCKG - BKQNY
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.81%
FLEW - BKQNY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKNIY - BKQNY
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
BKRIF - BKQNY
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.35%
More

FLEW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLEW has been loosely correlated with PVBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLEW jumps, then PVBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLEW
1D Price
Change %
FLEW100%
N/A
PVBK - FLEW
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KBCSF - FLEW
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LUMB - FLEW
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKQNY - FLEW
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDVR - FLEW
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
More