BKQNF
Price
$4.13
Change
+$0.27 (+6.98%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.37B
FCOB
Price
$16.83
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
81.25M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BKQNF vs FCOB

Header iconBKQNF vs FCOB Comparison
Open Charts BKQNF vs FCOBBanner chart's image
Bank of Queensland
Price$4.13
Change+$0.27 (+6.98%)
Volume$1.7K
Capitalization3.37B
1st Colonial Ban
Price$16.83
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$150
Capitalization81.25M
BKQNF vs FCOB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FCOB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKQNF vs. FCOB commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKQNF is a Buy and FCOB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (BKQNF: $4.14 vs. FCOB: $16.83)
Brand notoriety: BKQNF and FCOB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKQNF: 100% vs. FCOB: 2%
Market capitalization -- BKQNF: $3.37B vs. FCOB: $81.25M
BKQNF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.37B. FCOB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $81.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKQNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFCOB’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BKQNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FCOB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCOB is a better buy in the long-term than BKQNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCOB’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FCOB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BKQNF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FCOB (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKQNF($3.37B) has a higher market cap than FCOB($81.3M). BKQNF has higher P/E ratio than FCOB: BKQNF (16.01) vs FCOB (10.26). FCOB YTD gains are higher at: 12.952 vs. BKQNF (0.000). FCOB has less debt than BKQNF: FCOB (3.17M) vs BKQNF (17B).
BKQNFFCOBBKQNF / FCOB
Capitalization3.37B81.3M4,146%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.00012.952-
P/E Ratio16.0110.26156%
Revenue1.6BN/A-
Total CashN/A15.3M-
Total Debt17B3.17M536,955%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKQNF vs FCOB: Fundamental Ratings
BKQNF
FCOB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4391
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7219
SMR RATING
1..100
125
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5648
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9530
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
307

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FCOB's Valuation (51) in the null industry is in the same range as BKQNF (63). This means that FCOB’s stock grew similarly to BKQNF’s over the last 12 months.

FCOB's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BKQNF (72). This means that FCOB’s stock grew somewhat faster than BKQNF’s over the last 12 months.

FCOB's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as BKQNF (12). This means that FCOB’s stock grew similarly to BKQNF’s over the last 12 months.

FCOB's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as BKQNF (56). This means that FCOB’s stock grew similarly to BKQNF’s over the last 12 months.

FCOB's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BKQNF (95). This means that FCOB’s stock grew somewhat faster than BKQNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKQNFFCOB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
9%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCOB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ISTKF1.370.12
+9.60%
INTELLISTAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
AIQUF210.352.74
+1.32%
L'Air Liquide SA
DLTTF5.38N/A
N/A
Dalata Hotel Group PLC
DUFRY5.68-0.02
-0.33%
AVOLTA AG
SPRS2.35-0.15
-6.00%
Surge Components, Inc.

BKQNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKQNF has been closely correlated with MLYNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BKQNF jumps, then MLYNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKQNF
1D Price
Change %
BKQNF100%
N/A
MLYNF - BKQNF
70%
Closely correlated
N/A
CCFN - BKQNF
33%
Loosely correlated
+6.39%
BKCYF - BKQNF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCOB - BKQNF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.00%
FCCO - BKQNF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
More

FCOB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCOB and BKQNF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCOB and BKQNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCOB
1D Price
Change %
FCOB100%
-0.00%
BKQNF - FCOB
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADBKF - FCOB
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPOP - FCOB
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.07%
FMNB - FCOB
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
FBPA - FCOB
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More