BKQNF
Price
$4.13
Change
+$0.27 (+6.98%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.08B
CCFN
Price
$50.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
176.75M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BKQNF vs CCFN

Header iconBKQNF vs CCFN Comparison
Open Charts BKQNF vs CCFNBanner chart's image
Bank of Queensland
Price$4.13
Change+$0.27 (+6.98%)
Volume$1.7K
Capitalization3.08B
Muncy Columbia Financial
Price$50.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.04K
Capitalization176.75M
BKQNF vs CCFN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CCFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKQNF vs. CCFN commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKQNF is a Hold and CCFN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BKQNF: $4.14 vs. CCFN: $50.00)
Brand notoriety: BKQNF and CCFN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKQNF: 100% vs. CCFN: 155%
Market capitalization -- BKQNF: $3.08B vs. CCFN: $176.75M
BKQNF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.08B. CCFN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $176.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKQNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCCFN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BKQNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CCFN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCFN is a better buy in the long-term than BKQNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCFN’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CCFN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BKQNF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CCFN (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKQNF($3.08B) has a higher market cap than CCFN($177M). BKQNF has higher P/E ratio than CCFN: BKQNF (16.01) vs CCFN (8.71). CCFN YTD gains are higher at: 24.300 vs. BKQNF (0.000). CCFN has less debt than BKQNF: CCFN (45.5M) vs BKQNF (17B). BKQNF has higher revenues than CCFN: BKQNF (1.6B) vs CCFN (65M).
BKQNFCCFNBKQNF / CCFN
Capitalization3.08B177M1,742%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.00024.300-
P/E Ratio16.018.71184%
Revenue1.6B65M2,466%
Total CashN/A13.8M-
Total Debt17B45.5M37,363%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKQNF vs CCFN: Fundamental Ratings
BKQNF
CCFN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7456
SMR RATING
1..100
1148
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5745
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9489
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCFN's Valuation (35) in the null industry is in the same range as BKQNF (63). This means that CCFN’s stock grew similarly to BKQNF’s over the last 12 months.

CCFN's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as BKQNF (74). This means that CCFN’s stock grew similarly to BKQNF’s over the last 12 months.

BKQNF's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCFN (48). This means that BKQNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCFN’s over the last 12 months.

CCFN's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as BKQNF (57). This means that CCFN’s stock grew similarly to BKQNF’s over the last 12 months.

CCFN's P/E Growth Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as BKQNF (94). This means that CCFN’s stock grew similarly to BKQNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKQNFCCFN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
37%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DVYE29.440.19
+0.65%
iShares Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
AUDJPY97.95N/A
N/A
Australian Dollar - Japan Yen
JPYUSD0.01N/A
N/A
Japan Yen - United States Dollar
CNYEUR0.12N/A
N/A
China Yuan - Euro
GBPJPY199.85N/A
N/A
United Kingdom Pound - Japan Yen

BKQNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKQNF has been closely correlated with MLYNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BKQNF jumps, then MLYNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKQNF
1D Price
Change %
BKQNF100%
N/A
MLYNF - BKQNF
70%
Closely correlated
N/A
CCFN - BKQNF
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BKCYF - BKQNF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCOB - BKQNF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
FCCO - BKQNF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
More

CCFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCFN has been loosely correlated with BKQNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCFN jumps, then BKQNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCFN
1D Price
Change %
CCFN100%
N/A
BKQNF - CCFN
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MLYNF - CCFN
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HAFC - CCFN
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
CEFC - CCFN
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCRDF - CCFN
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More