BKOR
Price
$28.50
Change
+$0.26 (+0.92%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
78.17M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SFBS
Price
$70.67
Change
-$0.60 (-0.84%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.86B
73 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BKOR vs SFBS

Header iconBKOR vs SFBS Comparison
Open Charts BKOR vs SFBSBanner chart's image
Oak Ridge Financial Services
Price$28.50
Change+$0.26 (+0.92%)
Volume$700
Capitalization78.17M
ServisFirst Bancshares
Price$70.67
Change-$0.60 (-0.84%)
Volume$176.57K
Capitalization3.86B
BKOR vs SFBS Comparison Chart in %
BKOR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKOR vs. SFBS commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKOR is a Hold and SFBS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (BKOR: $28.50 vs. SFBS: $71.27)
Brand notoriety: BKOR and SFBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKOR: 22% vs. SFBS: 106%
Market capitalization -- BKOR: $78.17M vs. SFBS: $3.86B
BKOR [@Regional Banks] is valued at $78.17M. SFBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKOR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSFBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BKOR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SFBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BKOR is a better buy in the long-term than SFBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BKOR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BKOR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SFBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFBS is a better buy in the short-term than BKOR.

Price Growth

BKOR (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.88% price change this week, while SFBS (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

SFBS is expected to report earnings on Jan 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFBS($3.86B) has a higher market cap than BKOR($78.2M). SFBS has higher P/E ratio than BKOR: SFBS (15.13) vs BKOR (13.83). BKOR YTD gains are higher at: 40.173 vs. SFBS (-14.494). SFBS has more cash in the bank: 141M vs. BKOR (11M). BKOR has less debt than SFBS: BKOR (20.7M) vs SFBS (64.7M). SFBS has higher revenues than BKOR: SFBS (516M) vs BKOR (27M).
BKORSFBSBKOR / SFBS
Capitalization78.2M3.86B2%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD40.173-14.494-277%
P/E Ratio13.8315.1391%
Revenue27M516M5%
Total Cash11M141M8%
Total Debt20.7M64.7M32%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKOR vs SFBS: Fundamental Ratings
BKOR
SFBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
948
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
756
SMR RATING
1..100
6216
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4377
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1088
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1450

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BKOR's Valuation (58) in the null industry is in the same range as SFBS (77) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BKOR’s stock grew similarly to SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

BKOR's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFBS (56) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BKOR’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

SFBS's SMR Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BKOR (62) in the null industry. This means that SFBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BKOR’s over the last 12 months.

BKOR's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFBS (77) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BKOR’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

BKOR's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SFBS (88) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BKOR’s stock grew significantly faster than SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKORSFBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BKOR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DSKIF24.00N/A
N/A
Daiseki Co., Ltd.
ROYTL0.18N/A
N/A
Pacific Coast Oil Trust
AHEXF28.00N/A
N/A
Adecco Group AG
FEOVF0.57N/A
N/A
Oceanic Iron Ore Corp.
HXGBY12.31-0.17
-1.37%
Hexagon AB

BKOR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BKOR and CSHX have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BKOR and CSHX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKOR
1D Price
Change %
BKOR100%
+0.92%
CSHX - BKOR
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UOVEY - BKOR
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
SFBS - BKOR
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.48%
BKQNY - BKOR
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKRKF - BKOR
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SFBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFBS has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFBS jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFBS
1D Price
Change %
SFBS100%
-1.48%
TRMK - SFBS
88%
Closely correlated
-1.30%
FNB - SFBS
87%
Closely correlated
+0.81%
SBCF - SFBS
87%
Closely correlated
-1.28%
UBSI - SFBS
87%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
WSFS - SFBS
86%
Closely correlated
-1.35%
More