Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BKMIX vs FHLKX
BKMIX vs FHLKX Comparison
Open Charts BKMIX vs FHLKX
BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio K
Price$10.59
Change-$0.05 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.54B
Fidelity Health Savings K
Price$11.09
Change-$0.08 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.38M
BKMIX vs FHLKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BKMIX vs. FHLKX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKMIX is a StrongBuy and FHLKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKMIX has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. FHLKX (67.4M). BKMIX pays higher dividends than FHLKX: BKMIX (5.79) vs FHLKX (2.87). BKMIX was incepted earlier than FHLKX: BKMIX (9 years) vs FHLKX (6 years). BKMIX (0.62) is less costly to investors than FHLKX (0.39). BKMIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FHLKX (28.00). FHLKX has a lower initial minimum investment than BKMIX: FHLKX (0) vs BKMIX (5000000). FHLKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.04 vs. BKMIX (9.44). BKMIX return over 5 years is better than : 27.25 vs. FHLKX (19.10).
| BKMIX | FHLKX | BKMIX / FHLKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.39 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.39 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.281 | 11.510 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.5B | 67.4M | 15,579% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.79 | 2.87 | 202% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.44 | 11.04 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.85 | 30.41 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.25 | 19.10 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers