Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BKMC vs XMHQ
BKMC vs XMHQ Comparison
Open Charts BKMC vs XMHQ
BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF
Price$115.51
Change+$6.85 (+6.30%)
Volume$15.41K
Net Assets640.22M
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
Price$106.42
Change+$2.10 (+2.01%)
Volume$479.19K
Net Assets5.28B
BKMC vs XMHQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BKMC vs. XMHQ commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKMC is a Hold and XMHQ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XMHQ has more net assets: 5.29B vs. BKMC (640M). BKMC has a higher annual dividend yield than XMHQ: BKMC (6.038) vs XMHQ (3.905). BKMC was incepted earlier than XMHQ: BKMC (6 years) vs XMHQ (19 years). BKMC (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than XMHQ (0.25).
| BKMC | XMHQ | BKMC / XMHQ | |
| Gain YTD | 6.038 | 3.905 | 155% |
| Net Assets | 640M | 5.29B | 12% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.25 | 16% |
| Turnover | N/A | 58.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.29 | 0.62 | 208% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BKMC | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 14 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BKMC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKMC has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BKMC jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BKMC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BKMC | 100% | +0.08% | ||
| EVR - BKMC | 85% Closely correlated | -4.50% | ||
| PNR - BKMC | 84% Closely correlated | -10.16% | ||
| FLS - BKMC | 83% Closely correlated | +0.71% | ||
| CG - BKMC | 83% Closely correlated | -3.46% | ||
| SF - BKMC | 83% Closely correlated | +0.08% | ||
More | ||||
XMHQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XMHQ has been closely correlated with AIT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XMHQ jumps, then AIT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XMHQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XMHQ | 100% | -0.56% | ||
| AIT - XMHQ | 80% Closely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| SEIC - XMHQ | 78% Closely correlated | -5.14% | ||
| GGG - XMHQ | 78% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| VNT - XMHQ | 78% Closely correlated | +2.65% | ||
| DCI - XMHQ | 77% Closely correlated | +2.21% | ||
More | ||||