Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BKMC vs SCHM
BKMC vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts BKMC vs SCHM
BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF
Price$107.44
Change+$0.21 (+0.20%)
Volume$8.55K
Net Assets596.16M
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$29.49
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
Volume$934.3K
Net Assets12.07B
BKMC vs SCHM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BKMC vs. SCHM commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKMC is a Hold and SCHM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 12.1B vs. BKMC (596M). SCHM has a higher annual dividend yield than BKMC: SCHM (7.570) vs BKMC (6.801). BKMC was incepted earlier than SCHM: BKMC (6 years) vs SCHM (15 years). BKMC (0.04) and SCHM (0.04) have comparable expense ratios . BKMC has a higher turnover SCHM (13.00) vs SCHM (13.00).
| BKMC | SCHM | BKMC / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | 6.801 | 7.570 | 90% |
| Net Assets | 596M | 12.1B | 5% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.04 | 100% |
| Turnover | 93.63 | 13.00 | 720% |
| Yield | 1.42 | 1.43 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BKMC | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 74% | 9 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BKMC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKMC has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BKMC jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BKMC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BKMC | 100% | +0.20% | ||
| EVR - BKMC | 85% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| PNR - BKMC | 84% Closely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| SF - BKMC | 84% Closely correlated | +1.64% | ||
| CG - BKMC | 83% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| FLS - BKMC | 82% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
More | ||||
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | +0.10% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | -3.10% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
More | ||||