Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BKMC vs SCHM
BKMC vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts BKMC vs SCHM
BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF
Price$111.60
Change-$0.15 (-0.13%)
Volume$5.88K
Net Assets623.91M
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$30.65
Change-$0.03 (-0.10%)
Volume$675.59K
Net Assets12.53B
BKMC vs SCHM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BKMC vs. SCHM commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKMC is a Hold and SCHM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 12.5B vs. BKMC (624M). SCHM has a higher annual dividend yield than BKMC: SCHM (11.801) vs BKMC (10.941). BKMC was incepted earlier than SCHM: BKMC (6 years) vs SCHM (15 years). BKMC (0.04) and SCHM (0.04) have comparable expense ratios . BKMC has a higher turnover SCHM (17.00) vs SCHM (17.00).
| BKMC | SCHM | BKMC / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | 10.941 | 11.801 | 93% |
| Net Assets | 624M | 12.5B | 5% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.04 | 100% |
| Turnover | 93.63 | 17.00 | 551% |
| Yield | 1.41 | 1.41 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BKMC | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 6 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 75% | 11 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 73% | 5 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BKMC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKMC has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BKMC jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BKMC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BKMC | 100% | -0.13% | ||
| EVR - BKMC | 85% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| PNR - BKMC | 84% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| CG - BKMC | 83% Closely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| FLS - BKMC | 83% Closely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| SF - BKMC | 83% Closely correlated | +0.05% | ||
More | ||||
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.22% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.10% | ||
More | ||||