Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BKMBX vs FSMMX
BKMBX vs FSMMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BKMBX vs. FSMMX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKMBX is a Hold and FSMMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKMBX has more cash in the bank: 8B vs. FSMMX (1.68B). BKMBX pays higher dividends than FSMMX: BKMBX (4.02) vs FSMMX (2.02). BKMBX was incepted earlier than FSMMX: BKMBX (5 years) vs FSMMX (9 years). FSMMX (1.97) is less costly to investors than BKMBX (0.82). FSMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 987.00 vs. BKMBX (242.00). FSMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than BKMBX: FSMMX (2500) vs BKMBX (5000000). FSMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.80 vs. BKMBX (1.75). FSMMX return over 5 years is better than : 32.17 vs. BKMBX (22.21).
| BKMBX | FSMMX | BKMBX / FSMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.97 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.97 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.766 | 3.881 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 2500 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8B | 1.68B | 477% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.02 | 2.02 | 199% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.75 | 3.80 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.68 | 12.48 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.21 | 32.17 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement