Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BKMBX vs FSLTX
BKMBX vs FSLTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.88B vs. FSLTX (2.56B). BKMBX (4.10) and FSLTX (4.00) have matching dividends . BKMBX was incepted earlier than FSLTX: BKMBX (5 years) vs FSLTX (3 years). FSLTX (1.72) is less costly to investors than BKMBX (0.82). BKMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 242.00 vs. FSLTX (106.00). FSLTX has a lower initial minimum investment than BKMBX: FSLTX (0) vs BKMBX (5000000). FSLTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.02 vs. BKMBX (2.79).
| BKMBX | FSLTX | BKMBX / FSLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.47 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.72 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.478 | 4.567 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.88B | 2.56B | 309% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.10 | 4.00 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.79 | 7.02 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.14 | 12.36 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement