Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BKMBX vs FSLTX
BKMBX vs FSLTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.94B vs. FSLTX (2.52B). BKMBX (4.02) and FSLTX (3.87) have matching dividends . BKMBX was incepted earlier than FSLTX: BKMBX (5 years) vs FSLTX (3 years). FSLTX (1.81) is less costly to investors than BKMBX (0.82). BKMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 242.00 vs. FSLTX (109.00). FSLTX has a lower initial minimum investment than BKMBX: FSLTX (0) vs BKMBX (5000000). FSLTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.58 vs. BKMBX (2.33).
| BKMBX | FSLTX | BKMBX / FSLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.56 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.81 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.964 | 7.802 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.94B | 2.52B | 315% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.02 | 3.87 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.33 | 7.58 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.55 | 14.68 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.96 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ACEVX | 11.63 | 0.08 | +0.69% |
| American Century International Val Inv | |||
| ANTSX | 11.97 | 0.03 | +0.25% |
| American Century Intl Sm-Md Cp Inv | |||
| NELIX | 67.89 | 0.13 | +0.19% |
| Nuveen Equity Long/Short I | |||
| BGEWX | 12.38 | -0.03 | -0.24% |
| Baillie Gifford Emer Mkt Ex Chn Instl | |||
| HQITX | 20.79 | -2.11 | -9.21% |
| Hartford Equity Income R5 | |||