Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BKMBX vs FSLTX
BKMBX vs FSLTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.76B vs. FSLTX (2.61B). BKMBX pays higher dividends than FSLTX: BKMBX (4.04) vs FSLTX (3.29). BKMBX was incepted earlier than FSLTX: BKMBX (5 years) vs FSLTX (3 years). FSLTX (1.72) is less costly to investors than BKMBX (0.82). BKMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 242.00 vs. FSLTX (106.00). FSLTX has a lower initial minimum investment than BKMBX: FSLTX (0) vs BKMBX (5000000). FSLTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.95 vs. BKMBX (5.00).
| BKMBX | FSLTX | BKMBX / FSLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.47 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.72 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.379 | 3.628 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.76B | 2.61B | 298% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.04 | 3.29 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.00 | 5.95 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.94 | 10.79 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement