Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BKMBX vs FSKKX
BKMBX vs FSKKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BKMBX vs. FSKKX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKMBX is a Hold and FSKKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.99B vs. FSKKX (533M). FSKKX pays higher dividends than BKMBX: FSKKX (5.39) vs BKMBX (4.02). BKMBX was incepted earlier than FSKKX: BKMBX (5 years) vs FSKKX (12 years). FSKKX (2.97) is less costly to investors than BKMBX (0.82). FSKKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 266.59 vs. BKMBX (242.00). FSKKX has a lower initial minimum investment than BKMBX: FSKKX (1000) vs BKMBX (5000000). FSKKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.28 vs. BKMBX (1.75). BKMBX return over 5 years is better than : 22.09 vs. FSKKX (4.76).
| BKMBX | FSKKX | BKMBX / FSKKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 2.68 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 2.97 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.667 | 8.064 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000 | 500,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.99B | 533M | 1,499% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.02 | 5.39 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.75 | 3.28 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.22 | 15.58 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.09 | 4.76 | 464% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 19.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers