Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BKMBX vs FASRX
BKMBX vs FASRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BKMBX vs. FASRX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKMBX is a Hold and FASRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.99B vs. FASRX (533M). FASRX pays higher dividends than BKMBX: FASRX (5.89) vs BKMBX (4.02). BKMBX was incepted earlier than FASRX: BKMBX (5 years) vs FASRX (12 years). FASRX (2.40) is less costly to investors than BKMBX (0.82). FASRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 266.59 vs. BKMBX (242.00). FASRX has a lower initial minimum investment than BKMBX: FASRX (1000000) vs BKMBX (5000000). FASRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.65 vs. BKMBX (1.75). BKMBX return over 5 years is better than : 22.09 vs. FASRX (7.62).
| BKMBX | FASRX | BKMBX / FASRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 2.18 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 2.40 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.667 | 8.379 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.99B | 533M | 1,499% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.02 | 5.89 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.75 | 3.65 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.22 | 17.44 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.09 | 7.62 | 290% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 25.55 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers