Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BKMBX vs FASCX
BKMBX vs FASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BKMBX vs. FASCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKMBX is a Hold and FASCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKMBX has more cash in the bank: 8.2B vs. FASCX (524M). BKMBX pays higher dividends than FASCX: BKMBX (2.36) vs FASCX (1.45). BKMBX was incepted earlier than FASCX: BKMBX (5 years) vs FASCX (12 years). FASCX (3.47) is less costly to investors than BKMBX (0.82). FASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 266.59 vs. BKMBX (242.00). FASCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BKMBX: FASCX (1000) vs BKMBX (5000000). BKMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.37 vs. FASCX (3.76). BKMBX return over 5 years is better than : 22.23 vs. FASCX (-2.85).
| BKMBX | FASCX | BKMBX / FASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 3.18 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 3.47 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.158 | 1.590 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000 | 500,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.2B | 524M | 1,565% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.36 | 1.45 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.37 | 3.76 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.95 | 10.65 | 197% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.23 | -2.85 | -780% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 16.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers