Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BKLC vs ONOF
BKLC vs ONOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BKLC vs. ONOF commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKLC is a Buy and ONOF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKLC has more net assets: 4.95B vs. ONOF (142M). BKLC has a higher annual dividend yield than ONOF: BKLC (18.992) vs ONOF (9.797). BKLC was incepted earlier than ONOF: BKLC (6 years) vs ONOF (5 years). BKLC (0.00) has a lower expense ratio than ONOF (0.39). ONOF has a higher turnover BKLC (16.00) vs BKLC (16.00).
| BKLC | ONOF | BKLC / ONOF | |
| Gain YTD | 18.992 | 9.797 | 194% |
| Net Assets | 4.95B | 142M | 3,489% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.39 | - |
| Turnover | 16.00 | 241.46 | 7% |
| Yield | 1.03 | 1.05 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BKLC | ONOF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BKLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKLC has been closely correlated with AAPL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BKLC jumps, then AAPL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BKLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BKLC | 100% | +0.19% | ||
| AAPL - BKLC | 69% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| BLK - BKLC | 68% Closely correlated | +1.71% | ||
| APH - BKLC | 67% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| MCO - BKLC | 66% Closely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| TEL - BKLC | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
More | ||||
ONOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONOF has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ONOF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ONOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONOF | 100% | +0.21% | ||
| MSFT - ONOF | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.03% | ||
| META - ONOF | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| AMZN - ONOF | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| AAPL - ONOF | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| NVDA - ONOF | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.55% | ||
More | ||||