Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BKLC vs FCTR
BKLC vs FCTR Comparison
Open Charts BKLC vs FCTR
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
Price$127.47
Change+$0.70 (+0.55%)
Volume$70.93K
Net Assets4.41B
First Trust Lunt US Factor Rotation ETF
Price$35.15
Change+$0.34 (+0.98%)
Volume$4.13K
Net Assets58.06M
BKLC vs FCTR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BKLC vs. FCTR commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKLC is a Hold and FCTR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKLC has more net assets: 4.42B vs. FCTR (58.1M). BKLC has a higher annual dividend yield than FCTR: BKLC (14.426) vs FCTR (7.045). BKLC was incepted earlier than FCTR: BKLC (5 years) vs FCTR (7 years). BKLC (0.00) has a lower expense ratio than FCTR (0.65). FCTR has a higher turnover BKLC (16.00) vs BKLC (16.00).
| BKLC | FCTR | BKLC / FCTR | |
| Gain YTD | 14.426 | 7.045 | 205% |
| Net Assets | 4.42B | 58.1M | 7,599% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.65 | - |
| Turnover | 16.00 | 431.00 | 4% |
| Yield | 1.10 | 0.65 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BKLC | FCTR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BKLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKLC has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BKLC jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BKLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BKLC | 100% | +0.55% | ||
| MSFT - BKLC | 67% Closely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| AAPL - BKLC | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| AMZN - BKLC | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| AVGO - BKLC | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| META - BKLC | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.69% | ||
More | ||||
FCTR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCTR has been loosely correlated with V. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCTR jumps, then V could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCTR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCTR | 100% | +0.98% | ||
| V - FCTR | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| ZM - FCTR | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.62% | ||
| RSG - FCTR | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.60% | ||
| MMC - FCTR | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.80% | ||
| LW - FCTR | 16% Poorly correlated | +4.52% | ||
More | ||||