BKKPF
Price
$4.60
Change
-$0.20 (-4.17%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
8.76B
CYVF
Price
$72.00
Change
+$1.00 (+1.41%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
91.96M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BKKPF vs CYVF

Header iconBKKPF vs CYVF Comparison
Open Charts BKKPF vs CYVFBanner chart's image
Bangkok Bank Public
Price$4.60
Change-$0.20 (-4.17%)
Volume$7K
Capitalization8.76B
Crystal Valley Financial
Price$72.00
Change+$1.00 (+1.41%)
Volume$220
Capitalization91.96M
BKKPF vs CYVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BKKPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CYVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKKPF vs. CYVF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKKPF is a Hold and CYVF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BKKPF: $4.60 vs. CYVF: $72.00)
Brand notoriety: BKKPF and CYVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKKPF: 251% vs. CYVF: 9%
Market capitalization -- BKKPF: $8.76B vs. CYVF: $91.96M
BKKPF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $8.76B. CYVF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $91.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKKPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCYVF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BKKPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CYVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CYVF is a better buy in the long-term than BKKPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BKKPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CYVF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BKKPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CYVF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BKKPF and CYVF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BKKPF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.17% price change this week, while CYVF (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKKPF($8.76B) has a higher market cap than CYVF($92M). CYVF has higher P/E ratio than BKKPF: CYVF (8.14) vs BKKPF (5.96). BKKPF YTD gains are higher at: 23.656 vs. CYVF (14.980). CYVF has less debt than BKKPF: CYVF (39.5M) vs BKKPF (555B). BKKPF has higher revenues than CYVF: BKKPF (193B) vs CYVF (34.3M).
BKKPFCYVFBKKPF / CYVF
Capitalization8.76B92M9,525%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.65614.980158%
P/E Ratio5.968.1473%
Revenue193B34.3M562,682%
Total CashN/A12.1M-
Total Debt555B39.5M1,405,063%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKKPF vs CYVF: Fundamental Ratings
BKKPF
CYVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
579
SMR RATING
1..100
151
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5647
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5443
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CYVF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BKKPF (94). This means that CYVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BKKPF’s over the last 12 months.

CYVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BKKPF (57). This means that CYVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BKKPF’s over the last 12 months.

BKKPF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CYVF (51). This means that BKKPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CYVF’s over the last 12 months.

CYVF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as BKKPF (56). This means that CYVF’s stock grew similarly to BKKPF’s over the last 12 months.

CYVF's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as BKKPF (54). This means that CYVF’s stock grew similarly to BKKPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKKPFCYVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
10%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
32%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BKKPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CYVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTSOX45.820.34
+0.75%
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth R6
CCRZX16.440.10
+0.61%
Columbia Disciplined Core Inst
WFIOX60.910.36
+0.59%
Allspring Index Admin
PUMYX15.04N/A
N/A
PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Y
IJPIX12.51-0.11
-0.87%
VY® JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity S

BKKPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BKKPF and BLHK have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BKKPF and BLHK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKKPF
1D Price
Change %
BKKPF100%
N/A
BLHK - BKKPF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGTFF - BKKPF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CYVF - BKKPF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOTJ - BKKPF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
BGKKF - BKKPF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CYVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CYVF and ILPMY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYVF and ILPMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYVF
1D Price
Change %
CYVF100%
N/A
ILPMY - CYVF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFBK - CYVF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSUN - CYVF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
SSBI - CYVF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
ALRS - CYVF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
More