BKKPF
Price
$5.23
Change
+$0.68 (+14.95%)
Updated
Nov 19 closing price
Capitalization
9.86B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BLHK
Price
$33.99
Change
+$2.89 (+9.29%)
Updated
Dec 1 closing price
Capitalization
200.26M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BKKPF vs BLHK

Header iconBKKPF vs BLHK Comparison
Open Charts BKKPF vs BLHKBanner chart's image
Bangkok Bank Public
Price$5.23
Change+$0.68 (+14.95%)
Volume$60.1K
Capitalization9.86B
BlueHarbor Bank (Mooresville NC)
Price$33.99
Change+$2.89 (+9.29%)
Volume$100
Capitalization200.26M
BKKPF vs BLHK Comparison Chart in %
BKKPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BLHK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKKPF vs. BLHK commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKKPF is a Hold and BLHK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BKKPF: $5.23 vs. BLHK: $33.99)
Brand notoriety: BKKPF and BLHK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKKPF: 402% vs. BLHK: 18%
Market capitalization -- BKKPF: $9.86B vs. BLHK: $200.26M
BKKPF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $9.86B. BLHK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $200.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKKPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBLHK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BKKPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BLHK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BKKPF is a better buy in the long-term than BLHK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BKKPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BLHK’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BKKPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • BLHK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLHK is a better buy in the short-term than BKKPF.

Price Growth

BKKPF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BLHK (@Regional Banks) price change was +9.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.92% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKKPF($9.86B) has a higher market cap than BLHK($200M). BLHK has higher P/E ratio than BKKPF: BLHK (16.50) vs BKKPF (6.57). BLHK YTD gains are higher at: 56.072 vs. BKKPF (40.591). BKKPF has higher revenues than BLHK: BKKPF (193B) vs BLHK (18.6M).
BKKPFBLHKBKKPF / BLHK
Capitalization9.86B200M4,932%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD40.59156.07272%
P/E Ratio6.5716.5040%
Revenue193B18.6M1,037,634%
Total CashN/A5.89M-
Total Debt555BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKKPF vs BLHK: Fundamental Ratings
BKKPF
BLHK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
367
SMR RATING
1..100
156
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4345
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3512
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BLHK's Valuation (73) in the null industry is in the same range as BKKPF (84). This means that BLHK’s stock grew similarly to BKKPF’s over the last 12 months.

BLHK's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as BKKPF (36). This means that BLHK’s stock grew similarly to BKKPF’s over the last 12 months.

BKKPF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLHK (56). This means that BKKPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLHK’s over the last 12 months.

BKKPF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as BLHK (45). This means that BKKPF’s stock grew similarly to BLHK’s over the last 12 months.

BLHK's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as BKKPF (35). This means that BLHK’s stock grew similarly to BKKPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKKPFBLHK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
38%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
26%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
29%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BKKPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BLHK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UBR28.841.14
+4.12%
ProShares Ultra MSCI Brazil Capped
DEED21.610.01
+0.03%
First Trust Securitized Plus ETF
FLXN25.88-0.02
-0.10%
Horizon Flexible Income ETF
ASHR32.60-0.23
-0.70%
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A ETF
DFJ94.65-0.98
-1.03%
WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend ETF

BKKPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BKKPF and BLHK have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BKKPF and BLHK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKKPF
1D Price
Change %
BKKPF100%
N/A
BLHK - BKKPF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CYVF - BKKPF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BGKKF - BKKPF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGTFF - BKKPF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PWBK - BKKPF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BLHK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BLHK and BKKPF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BLHK and BKKPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLHK
1D Price
Change %
BLHK100%
N/A
BKKPF - BLHK
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBCO - BLHK
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMTDF - BLHK
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSHX - BLHK
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANDC - BLHK
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More