BKKLY
Price
$27.30
Change
-$0.44 (-1.59%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
10.36B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MSWV
Price
$17.26
Change
-$0.23 (-1.32%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
135.13M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BKKLY vs MSWV

Header iconBKKLY vs MSWV Comparison
Open Charts BKKLY vs MSWVBanner chart's image
Bangkok Bank Public
Price$27.30
Change-$0.44 (-1.59%)
Volume$3.32K
Capitalization10.36B
Main Street Financial Services
Price$17.26
Change-$0.23 (-1.32%)
Volume$4.3K
Capitalization135.13M
BKKLY vs MSWV Comparison Chart in %
BKKLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MSWV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKKLY vs. MSWV commentary
Dec 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKKLY is a Buy and MSWV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BKKLY: $27.30 vs. MSWV: $17.26)
Brand notoriety: BKKLY and MSWV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKKLY: 50% vs. MSWV: 102%
Market capitalization -- BKKLY: $10.36B vs. MSWV: $135.13M
BKKLY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $10.36B. MSWV’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $135.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $170.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKKLY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMSWV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BKKLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MSWV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BKKLY is a better buy in the long-term than MSWV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BKKLY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSWV’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BKKLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MSWV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BKKLY is a better buy in the short-term than MSWV.

Price Growth

BKKLY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.73% price change this week, while MSWV (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.29% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKKLY($10.4B) has a higher market cap than MSWV($135M). MSWV has higher P/E ratio than BKKLY: MSWV (8.63) vs BKKLY (6.67). MSWV YTD gains are higher at: 25.379 vs. BKKLY (23.953). MSWV has less debt than BKKLY: MSWV (46.7M) vs BKKLY (522B). BKKLY has higher revenues than MSWV: BKKLY (195B) vs MSWV (51.5M).
BKKLYMSWVBKKLY / MSWV
Capitalization10.4B135M7,704%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.95325.37994%
P/E Ratio6.678.6377%
Revenue195B51.5M378,641%
Total CashN/A8.25M-
Total Debt522B46.7M1,117,773%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKKLY vs MSWV: Fundamental Ratings
BKKLY
MSWV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2482
SMR RATING
1..100
150
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4446
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5499
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a39

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MSWV's Valuation (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BKKLY (83). This means that MSWV’s stock grew somewhat faster than BKKLY’s over the last 12 months.

BKKLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MSWV (82). This means that BKKLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MSWV’s over the last 12 months.

BKKLY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MSWV (50). This means that BKKLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MSWV’s over the last 12 months.

BKKLY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as MSWV (46). This means that BKKLY’s stock grew similarly to MSWV’s over the last 12 months.

BKKLY's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MSWV (99). This means that BKKLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MSWV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKKLYMSWV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BKKLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MSWV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AEF7.090.17
+2.46%
abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund Inc.
SIJ11.030.06
+0.50%
ProShares UltraShort Industrials
MARW34.360.01
+0.02%
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer20 Mar ETF
VNMHF4.82N/A
N/A
Vietnam Holdings, Ltd.
USPX60.51-0.06
-0.10%
Franklin US Equity Index ETF

BKKLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BKKLY and KPCPY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BKKLY and KPCPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKKLY
1D Price
Change %
BKKLY100%
-1.59%
KPCPY - BKKLY
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.28%
MSWV - BKKLY
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
BPIRY - BKKLY
20%
Poorly correlated
+8.96%
BKRKY - BKKLY
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.38%
BKRIY - BKKLY
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
More

MSWV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSWV and BKAHF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSWV and BKAHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSWV
1D Price
Change %
MSWV100%
-1.32%
BKAHF - MSWV
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBN - MSWV
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
WTBFA - MSWV
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TKGBY - MSWV
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKKLY - MSWV
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
More