BKIMF
Price
$10.96
Change
+$0.18 (+1.67%)
Updated
Mar 12 closing price
Capitalization
5.82B
MSBB
Price
$14.65
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

BKIMF vs MSBB

Header iconBKIMF vs MSBB Comparison
Open Charts BKIMF vs MSBBBanner chart's image
Bankinter, S.A
Price$10.96
Change+$0.18 (+1.67%)
Volume$2.66K
Capitalization5.82B
Mercer Ban
Price$14.65
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$477
CapitalizationN/A
BKIMF vs MSBB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MSBB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKIMF vs. MSBB commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKIMF is a Buy and MSBB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BKIMF: $10.96 vs. MSBB: $14.65)
Brand notoriety: BKIMF and MSBB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKIMF: 100% vs. MSBB: 63%
Market capitalization -- BKIMF: $5.82B vs. MSBB: $0
BKIMF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $5.82B. MSBB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKIMF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMSBB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BKIMF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MSBB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BKIMF is a better buy in the long-term than MSBB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MSBB’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MSBB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

BKIMF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MSBB (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKIMF YTD gains are higher at: 37.000 vs. MSBB (4.643).
BKIMFMSBBBKIMF / MSBB
Capitalization5.82BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD37.0004.643797%
P/E Ratio6.51N/A-
Revenue2.65BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt7.66BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKIMF: Fundamental Ratings
BKIMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4
SMR RATING
1..100
9
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
28
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKIMFMSBB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
29%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
28%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
20%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MSBB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AES11.520.39
+3.50%
AES Corp
XPER8.140.04
+0.49%
Xperi
JAMF9.31-0.08
-0.85%
Jamf Holding Corp
ATNF0.88-0.02
-1.93%
180 Life Sciences Corp
BMEA1.66-0.06
-3.49%
Biomea Fusion

BKIMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKIMF has been loosely correlated with GWBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BKIMF jumps, then GWBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKIMF
1D Price
Change %
BKIMF100%
N/A
GWBK - BKIMF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MSBB - BKIMF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNWD - BKIMF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
LYBC - BKIMF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NCXS - BKIMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MSBB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSBB and FNWD have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSBB and FNWD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSBB
1D Price
Change %
MSBB100%
N/A
FNWD - MSBB
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
BKIMF - MSBB
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KPCPY - MSBB
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.30%
CCRDF - MSBB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SFGIF - MSBB
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More