BKIMF
Price
$15.45
Change
+$0.90 (+6.19%)
Updated
Sep 16 closing price
Capitalization
13.92B
FNWD
Price
$32.30
Change
+$0.08 (+0.25%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
139.69M
37 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BKIMF vs FNWD

Header iconBKIMF vs FNWD Comparison
Open Charts BKIMF vs FNWDBanner chart's image
Bankinter, S.A
Price$15.45
Change+$0.90 (+6.19%)
Volume$1.19K
Capitalization13.92B
Finward Ban
Price$32.30
Change+$0.08 (+0.25%)
Volume$4.65K
Capitalization139.69M
BKIMF vs FNWD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BKIMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNWD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKIMF vs. FNWD commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKIMF is a Hold and FNWD is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BKIMF: $15.45 vs. FNWD: $32.30)
Brand notoriety: BKIMF and FNWD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKIMF: 63% vs. FNWD: 9%
Market capitalization -- BKIMF: $13.92B vs. FNWD: $139.69M
BKIMF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $13.92B. FNWD’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $139.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKIMF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFNWD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BKIMF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FNWD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BKIMF is a better buy in the long-term than FNWD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BKIMF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNWD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BKIMF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FNWD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BKIMF is a better buy in the short-term than FNWD.

Price Growth

BKIMF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FNWD (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNWD is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKIMF($13.9B) has a higher market cap than FNWD($140M). FNWD has higher P/E ratio than BKIMF: FNWD (26.05) vs BKIMF (11.90). BKIMF YTD gains are higher at: 93.125 vs. FNWD (16.304). FNWD has less debt than BKIMF: FNWD (65M) vs BKIMF (10.2B). BKIMF has higher revenues than FNWD: BKIMF (3.07B) vs FNWD (63.4M).
BKIMFFNWDBKIMF / FNWD
Capitalization13.9B140M9,929%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD93.12516.304571%
P/E Ratio11.9026.0546%
Revenue3.07B63.4M4,839%
Total CashN/A18.6M-
Total Debt10.2B65M15,692%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKIMF vs FNWD: Fundamental Ratings
BKIMF
FNWD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5085
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
282
SMR RATING
1..100
973
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3749
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
147
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
32n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BKIMF's Valuation (71) in the null industry is in the same range as FNWD (83). This means that BKIMF’s stock grew similarly to FNWD’s over the last 12 months.

BKIMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNWD (82). This means that BKIMF’s stock grew significantly faster than FNWD’s over the last 12 months.

BKIMF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNWD (73). This means that BKIMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNWD’s over the last 12 months.

BKIMF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as FNWD (49). This means that BKIMF’s stock grew similarly to FNWD’s over the last 12 months.

FNWD's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as BKIMF (14). This means that FNWD’s stock grew similarly to BKIMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKIMFFNWD
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BKIMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNWD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMPO20.700.39
+1.92%
CompoSecure
ALLT9.940.15
+1.53%
Allot Ltd
TAOP3.030.02
+0.66%
Taoping Inc
XBIT2.700.01
+0.37%
XBiotech
SUZ9.24-0.13
-1.39%
Suzano SA

BKIMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKIMF has been loosely correlated with GWBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BKIMF jumps, then GWBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKIMF
1D Price
Change %
BKIMF100%
N/A
GWBK - BKIMF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MSBB - BKIMF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.92%
FNWD - BKIMF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
LYBC - BKIMF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NCXS - BKIMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.68%
More

FNWD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNWD has been loosely correlated with UBFO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNWD jumps, then UBFO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNWD
1D Price
Change %
FNWD100%
+0.25%
UBFO - FNWD
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
HBNC - FNWD
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
BANC - FNWD
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
KRNY - FNWD
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
IBCP - FNWD
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
More