BKIMF
Price
$14.55
Change
+$3.59 (+32.76%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
13.11B
FNWD
Price
$32.55
Change
-$0.08 (-0.25%)
Updated
Sep 8, 12:23 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
141.12M
57 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BKIMF vs FNWD

Header iconBKIMF vs FNWD Comparison
Open Charts BKIMF vs FNWDBanner chart's image
Bankinter, S.A
Price$14.55
Change+$3.59 (+32.76%)
Volume$350
Capitalization13.11B
Finward Ban
Price$32.55
Change-$0.08 (-0.25%)
Volume$100
Capitalization141.12M
BKIMF vs FNWD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BKIMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNWD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKIMF vs. FNWD commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKIMF is a Hold and FNWD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BKIMF: $14.55 vs. FNWD: $32.63)
Brand notoriety: BKIMF and FNWD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKIMF: 14% vs. FNWD: 17%
Market capitalization -- BKIMF: $13.11B vs. FNWD: $141.12M
BKIMF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $13.11B. FNWD’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $141.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKIMF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFNWD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BKIMF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FNWD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BKIMF is a better buy in the long-term than FNWD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BKIMF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNWD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BKIMF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • FNWD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BKIMF and FNWD are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BKIMF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +32.76% price change this week, while FNWD (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNWD is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.15% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKIMF($13.1B) has a higher market cap than FNWD($141M). FNWD has higher P/E ratio than BKIMF: FNWD (26.31) vs BKIMF (11.28). BKIMF YTD gains are higher at: 81.875 vs. FNWD (17.492). FNWD has less debt than BKIMF: FNWD (65M) vs BKIMF (10.2B).
BKIMFFNWDBKIMF / FNWD
Capitalization13.1B141M9,291%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD81.87517.492468%
P/E Ratio11.2826.3143%
Revenue3.07BN/A-
Total CashN/A18.6M-
Total Debt10.2B65M15,692%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKIMF vs FNWD: Fundamental Ratings
BKIMF
FNWD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
281
SMR RATING
1..100
973
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3744
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
146
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BKIMF's Valuation (68) in the null industry is in the same range as FNWD (83). This means that BKIMF’s stock grew similarly to FNWD’s over the last 12 months.

BKIMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNWD (81). This means that BKIMF’s stock grew significantly faster than FNWD’s over the last 12 months.

BKIMF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNWD (73). This means that BKIMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNWD’s over the last 12 months.

BKIMF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as FNWD (44). This means that BKIMF’s stock grew similarly to FNWD’s over the last 12 months.

FNWD's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as BKIMF (14). This means that FNWD’s stock grew similarly to BKIMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKIMFFNWD
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BKIMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNWD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CITY.X1.0172670.009867
+0.98%
Manchester City Fan Token cryptocurrency
BRFH3.090.01
+0.49%
Barfresh Food Group
TFIN63.85-0.29
-0.45%
Triumph Financial Inc
PNFP97.37-1.98
-1.99%
Pinnacle Financial Partners
TECX16.80-0.47
-2.72%
Tectonic Therapeutic Inc.

BKIMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKIMF has been loosely correlated with GWBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BKIMF jumps, then GWBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKIMF
1D Price
Change %
BKIMF100%
N/A
GWBK - BKIMF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MSBB - BKIMF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNWD - BKIMF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
LYBC - BKIMF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
NCXS - BKIMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More