BKHPF
Price
$18.28
Change
-$0.61 (-3.23%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
24.54B
LUMB
Price
$13.50
Change
-$1.00 (-6.90%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
44.86M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BKHPF vs LUMB

Header iconBKHPF vs LUMB Comparison
Open Charts BKHPF vs LUMBBanner chart's image
Bank Hapoalim B.M
Price$18.28
Change-$0.61 (-3.23%)
Volume$559
Capitalization24.54B
Lumbee Guaranty Bank
Price$13.50
Change-$1.00 (-6.90%)
Volume$13.71K
Capitalization44.86M
BKHPF vs LUMB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BKHPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKHPF vs. LUMB commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKHPF is a Buy and LUMB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BKHPF: $18.28 vs. LUMB: $13.50)
Brand notoriety: BKHPF and LUMB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKHPF: 144% vs. LUMB: 1875%
Market capitalization -- BKHPF: $24.54B vs. LUMB: $44.86M
BKHPF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $24.54B. LUMB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $44.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKHPF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileLUMB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BKHPF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • LUMB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BKHPF is a better buy in the long-term than LUMB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BKHPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LUMB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BKHPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • LUMB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BKHPF and LUMB are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BKHPF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LUMB (@Regional Banks) price change was -6.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKHPF($24.5B) has a higher market cap than LUMB($44.9M). BKHPF has higher P/E ratio than LUMB: BKHPF (9.66) vs LUMB (9.18). BKHPF YTD gains are higher at: 91.213 vs. LUMB (5.391). LUMB has less debt than BKHPF: LUMB (12.1K) vs BKHPF (26.6B).
BKHPFLUMBBKHPF / LUMB
Capitalization24.5B44.9M54,566%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD91.2135.3911,692%
P/E Ratio9.669.18105%
Revenue23.2BN/A-
Total CashN/A8.96M-
Total Debt26.6B12.1K219,834,711%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKHPF vs LUMB: Fundamental Ratings
BKHPF
LUMB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
247
SMR RATING
1..100
460
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3959
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1128
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BKHPF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LUMB (62). This means that BKHPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LUMB’s over the last 12 months.

BKHPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LUMB (47). This means that BKHPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LUMB’s over the last 12 months.

BKHPF's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LUMB (60). This means that BKHPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LUMB’s over the last 12 months.

BKHPF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as LUMB (59). This means that BKHPF’s stock grew similarly to LUMB’s over the last 12 months.

BKHPF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as LUMB (28). This means that BKHPF’s stock grew similarly to LUMB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKHPFLUMB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BKHPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZURA2.410.31
+14.76%
Zura Bio Limited
GELS1.400.05
+3.70%
Gelteq Ltd
CNP38.810.50
+1.31%
CenterPoint Energy
CATY48.590.22
+0.45%
Cathay General Bancorp
MCBS28.69-0.11
-0.38%
MetroCity Bankshares

BKHPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BKHPF and VBNK have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BKHPF and VBNK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKHPF
1D Price
Change %
BKHPF100%
N/A
VBNK - BKHPF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
CRARY - BKHPF
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.71%
CHBAF - BKHPF
31%
Poorly correlated
+34.83%
FMAO - BKHPF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.22%
CIXPF - BKHPF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LUMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LUMB has been loosely correlated with CRZY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LUMB jumps, then CRZY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUMB
1D Price
Change %
LUMB100%
N/A
CRZY - LUMB
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TYCB - LUMB
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MBLU - LUMB
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKHPF - LUMB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LOB - LUMB
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
More