BKHPF
Price
$18.89
Change
+$0.14 (+0.75%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
24.99B
FMAO
Price
$24.51
Change
-$0.65 (-2.58%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
336.38M
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BKHPF vs FMAO

Header iconBKHPF vs FMAO Comparison
Open Charts BKHPF vs FMAOBanner chart's image
Bank Hapoalim B.M
Price$18.89
Change+$0.14 (+0.75%)
Volume$400
Capitalization24.99B
Farmers & Merchants Ban
Price$24.51
Change-$0.65 (-2.58%)
Volume$84.62K
Capitalization336.38M
BKHPF vs FMAO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BKHPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMAO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKHPF vs. FMAO commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKHPF is a Buy and FMAO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (BKHPF: $18.89 vs. FMAO: $24.51)
Brand notoriety: BKHPF and FMAO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKHPF: 40% vs. FMAO: 336%
Market capitalization -- BKHPF: $24.99B vs. FMAO: $336.38M
BKHPF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $24.99B. FMAO’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $336.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKHPF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFMAO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BKHPF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FMAO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BKHPF is a better buy in the long-term than FMAO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BKHPF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMAO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BKHPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FMAO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BKHPF is a better buy in the short-term than FMAO.

Price Growth

BKHPF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.75% price change this week, while FMAO (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

FMAO is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKHPF($25B) has a higher market cap than FMAO($336M). FMAO has higher P/E ratio than BKHPF: FMAO (11.35) vs BKHPF (10.06). BKHPF YTD gains are higher at: 97.594 vs. FMAO (-15.272). FMAO has less debt than BKHPF: FMAO (280M) vs BKHPF (24.7B).
BKHPFFMAOBKHPF / FMAO
Capitalization25B336M7,440%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD97.594-15.272-639%
P/E Ratio10.0611.3589%
Revenue22.5BN/A-
Total CashN/A152M-
Total Debt24.7B280M8,821%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKHPF vs FMAO: Fundamental Ratings
BKHPF
FMAO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3264
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
277
SMR RATING
1..100
449
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3958
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1186
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4775

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BKHPF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is in the same range as FMAO (48) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that BKHPF’s stock grew similarly to FMAO’s over the last 12 months.

BKHPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FMAO (77) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that BKHPF’s stock grew significantly faster than FMAO’s over the last 12 months.

BKHPF's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMAO (49) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that BKHPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMAO’s over the last 12 months.

BKHPF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as FMAO (58) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that BKHPF’s stock grew similarly to FMAO’s over the last 12 months.

BKHPF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FMAO (86) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that BKHPF’s stock grew significantly faster than FMAO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKHPFFMAO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
1%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BKHPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMAO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMFNF28.931.98
+7.37%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group Inc.
CIADY20.950.08
+0.38%
China Mengniu Dairy Co., Ltd.
AJMPF2.30N/A
N/A
Ashmore Group Plc.
PTOAF0.39N/A
N/A
CAVVY ENERGY LTD.
PUMXF0.07-0.01
-11.85%
Puma Exploration, Inc.

BKHPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BKHPF and VBNK have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BKHPF and VBNK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKHPF
1D Price
Change %
BKHPF100%
N/A
VBNK - BKHPF
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.28%
CRARY - BKHPF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
CHBAF - BKHPF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FMAO - BKHPF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.58%
CIXPF - BKHPF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FMAO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMAO has been closely correlated with BHRB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMAO jumps, then BHRB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMAO
1D Price
Change %
FMAO100%
-2.58%
BHRB - FMAO
73%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
MCBS - FMAO
73%
Closely correlated
-1.95%
AROW - FMAO
72%
Closely correlated
-2.66%
CTBI - FMAO
72%
Closely correlated
-2.08%
NFBK - FMAO
72%
Closely correlated
-2.37%
More