BKHAU
Price
$10.51
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
IBAC
Price
$10.55
Change
+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
166.15M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BKHAU vs IBAC

Header iconBKHAU vs IBAC Comparison
Open Charts BKHAU vs IBACBanner chart's image
Black Hawk Acquisition
Price$10.51
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$119
CapitalizationN/A
IB Acquisition
Price$10.55
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Volume$25.12K
Capitalization166.15M
BKHAU vs IBAC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BKHAU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKHAU vs. IBAC commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKHAU is a StrongBuy and IBAC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BKHAU: $10.51 vs. IBAC: $10.55)
Brand notoriety: BKHAU and IBAC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKHAU: 100% vs. IBAC: 507%
Market capitalization -- BKHAU: $0 vs. IBAC: $166.15M
BKHAU [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. IBAC’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $166.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $172.13M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKHAU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIBAC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BKHAU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IBAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BKHAU is a better buy in the long-term than IBAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BKHAU’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BKHAU’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.

Price Growth

BKHAU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while IBAC (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.91%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.35% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IBAC YTD gains are higher at: 4.198 vs. BKHAU (-0.980). BKHAU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -542.54K vs. IBAC (-677.59K). IBAC has more cash in the bank: 486K vs. BKHAU (72.9K). BKHAU (0) and IBAC (0) have equivalent revenues.
BKHAUIBACBKHAU / IBAC
CapitalizationN/A166M-
EBITDA-542.54K-677.59K80%
Gain YTD-0.9804.198-23%
P/E RatioN/A43.96-
Revenue00-
Total Cash72.9K486K15%
Total DebtN/A148K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKHAU
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BKHAU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALCY11.390.39
+3.55%
Alchemy Investments Acquisition Corp
CHSCM24.750.17
+0.69%
CHS
GABC41.24-0.03
-0.06%
German American Bancorp
ICL6.13-0.09
-1.41%
ICL Group Ltd
OIS5.41-0.13
-2.35%
OIL States International

BKHAU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BKHAU and IBAC have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BKHAU and IBAC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKHAU
1D Price
Change %
BKHAU100%
N/A
IBAC - BKHAU
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
BAYA - BKHAU
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UMAC - BKHAU
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
ANSC - BKHAU
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AFJKU - BKHAU
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IBAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IBAC and LEGT have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IBAC and LEGT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IBAC
1D Price
Change %
IBAC100%
+0.09%
LEGT - IBAC
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
NETDU - IBAC
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKHAU - IBAC
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AFJK - IBAC
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
ALFUU - IBAC
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
More