Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BKGCX vs RERFX
BKGCX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts BKGCX vs RERFX
Baillie Gifford EAFE Plus All Cap K
Price$15.98
Change+$0.05 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets257.92M
American Funds EUPAC R5
Price$65.35
Change-$0.27 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.06B
BKGCX vs RERFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BKGCX vs. RERFX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKGCX is a Hold and RERFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. BKGCX (258M). BKGCX pays higher dividends than RERFX: BKGCX (3.72) vs RERFX (0.85). BKGCX was incepted earlier than RERFX: BKGCX (8 years) vs RERFX (23 years). BKGCX (0.66) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). RERFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BKGCX (23.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BKGCX: RERFX (250) vs BKGCX (10000000). RERFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.45 vs. BKGCX (5.04). RERFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.27 vs. BKGCX (-11.27).
| BKGCX | RERFX | BKGCX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.52 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.52 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.388 | 21.785 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 258M | 137B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.72 | 0.85 | 436% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.04 | 11.45 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.09 | 49.90 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.27 | 15.27 | -74% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 44.43 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement