Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BKGCX vs RERFX
BKGCX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts BKGCX vs RERFX
Baillie Gifford EAFE Plus All Cap K
Price$15.95
Change-$0.14 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.68M
American Funds EUPAC R5
Price$63.92
Change-$1.68 (-2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.63B
BKGCX vs RERFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BKGCX vs. RERFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKGCX is a Hold and RERFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. BKGCX (257M). BKGCX pays higher dividends than RERFX: BKGCX (10.75) vs RERFX (2.80). BKGCX was incepted earlier than RERFX: BKGCX (9 years) vs RERFX (24 years). BKGCX (0.66) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). RERFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BKGCX (23.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BKGCX: RERFX (250) vs BKGCX (10000000). RERFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.72 vs. BKGCX (-90.68). RERFX return over 5 years is better than : -2.76 vs. BKGCX (-93.50).
| BKGCX | RERFX | BKGCX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.52 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.52 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -77.148 | 5.670 | -1,361% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 257M | 135B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 10.75 | 2.80 | 384% |
| Returns for 1 year | -90.68 | 18.72 | -484% |
| Returns for 3 years | -90.72 | 26.85 | -338% |
| Returns for 5 years | -93.50 | -2.76 | 3,383% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 69.41 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers