Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BKGCX vs CEUFX
BKGCX vs CEUFX Comparison
Open Charts BKGCX vs CEUFX
Baillie Gifford EAFE Plus All Cap K
Price$15.95
Change-$0.14 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.68M
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$62.64
Change-$1.74 (-2.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.63B
BKGCX vs CEUFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BKGCX vs. CEUFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKGCX is a Hold and CEUFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. BKGCX (257M). BKGCX pays higher dividends than CEUFX: BKGCX (10.75) vs CEUFX (2.77). BKGCX was incepted earlier than CEUFX: BKGCX (9 years) vs CEUFX (23 years). CEUFX (0.91) is less costly to investors than BKGCX (0.66). CEUFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BKGCX (23.00). CEUFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BKGCX: CEUFX (250) vs BKGCX (10000000). CEUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.33 vs. BKGCX (-90.68). CEUFX return over 5 years is better than : -2.59 vs. BKGCX (-93.50).
| BKGCX | CEUFX | BKGCX / CEUFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.91 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.91 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -77.148 | 5.668 | -1,361% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 257M | 135B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 10.75 | 2.77 | 388% |
| Returns for 1 year | -90.68 | 18.33 | -495% |
| Returns for 3 years | -90.72 | 25.85 | -351% |
| Returns for 5 years | -93.50 | -2.59 | 3,605% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 78.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers