BKCYF
Price
$9.12
Change
-$0.27 (-2.88%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.62B
BKQNF
Price
$4.13
Change
+$0.27 (+6.98%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.96B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BKCYF vs BKQNF

Header iconBKCYF vs BKQNF Comparison
Open Charts BKCYF vs BKQNFBanner chart's image
Bank Cyprus Hldgs Pub
Price$9.12
Change-$0.27 (-2.88%)
Volume$100
Capitalization3.62B
Bank of Queensland
Price$4.13
Change+$0.27 (+6.98%)
Volume$1.7K
Capitalization2.96B
BKCYF vs BKQNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BKCYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKCYF vs. BKQNF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKCYF is a Hold and BKQNF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BKCYF: $9.12 vs. BKQNF: $4.14)
Brand notoriety: BKCYF and BKQNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKCYF: 17% vs. BKQNF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BKCYF: $3.62B vs. BKQNF: $2.96B
BKCYF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.62B. BKQNF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKCYF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileBKQNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BKCYF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • BKQNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BKCYF is a better buy in the long-term than BKQNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BKCYF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BKCYF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

BKCYF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.88% price change this week, while BKQNF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKCYF($3.62B) has a higher market cap than BKQNF($2.96B). BKQNF has higher P/E ratio than BKCYF: BKQNF (16.01) vs BKCYF (7.32). BKCYF YTD gains are higher at: 101.324 vs. BKQNF (0.000). BKCYF has less debt than BKQNF: BKCYF (1.34B) vs BKQNF (17B). BKQNF has higher revenues than BKCYF: BKQNF (1.6B) vs BKCYF (1.05B).
BKCYFBKQNFBKCYF / BKQNF
Capitalization3.62B2.96B122%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD101.3240.000-
P/E Ratio7.3216.0146%
Revenue1.05B1.6B65%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.34B17B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKCYF vs BKQNF: Fundamental Ratings
BKCYF
BKQNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
273
SMR RATING
1..100
1311
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3757
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9895
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4755

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BKCYF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BKQNF (62). This means that BKCYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BKQNF’s over the last 12 months.

BKCYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BKQNF (73). This means that BKCYF’s stock grew significantly faster than BKQNF’s over the last 12 months.

BKQNF's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as BKCYF (13). This means that BKQNF’s stock grew similarly to BKCYF’s over the last 12 months.

BKCYF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as BKQNF (57). This means that BKCYF’s stock grew similarly to BKQNF’s over the last 12 months.

BKQNF's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as BKCYF (98). This means that BKQNF’s stock grew similarly to BKCYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKCYFBKQNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
8%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
20%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BKCYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
FOREX / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USDEUR0.86N/A
N/A
United States Dollar - Euro
JPYCHF0.54N/A
N/A
Japan Yen - Switzerland Franc
CHFAUD1.90N/A
N/A
Switzerland Franc - Australian Dollar
EURNZD1.99N/A
N/A
Euro - New Zealand Dollar
ARIBX15.52N/A
N/A
Aristotle Small Cap Eq I

BKCYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BKCYF and BKQNF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BKCYF and BKQNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKCYF
1D Price
Change %
BKCYF100%
-2.88%
BKQNF - BKCYF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SFGIF - BKCYF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RF - BKCYF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
BMBN - BKCYF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNAT - BKCYF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.29%
More

BKQNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKQNF has been closely correlated with MLYNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BKQNF jumps, then MLYNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKQNF
1D Price
Change %
BKQNF100%
N/A
MLYNF - BKQNF
70%
Closely correlated
N/A
CCFN - BKQNF
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
BKCYF - BKQNF
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.88%
FCOB - BKQNF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCCO - BKQNF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
More