Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BKCPX vs PACAX
BKCPX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts BKCPX vs PACAX
BlackRock 20/80 Target Allocation K
Price$11.74
Change-$0.02 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets442.65M
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$11.24
Change-$0.02 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets603.7M
BKCPX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BKCPX vs. PACAX commentary
Jan 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKCPX is a Buy and PACAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 604M vs. BKCPX (443M). BKCPX pays higher dividends than PACAX: BKCPX (4.42) vs PACAX (4.03). BKCPX was incepted earlier than PACAX: BKCPX (10 years) vs PACAX (32 years). PACAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than BKCPX (0.36). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 243.00 vs. BKCPX (94.00). PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BKCPX: PACAX (0) vs BKCPX (5000000). BKCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.33 vs. PACAX (9.66). BKCPX return over 5 years is better than : 11.78 vs. PACAX (10.39).
| BKCPX | PACAX | BKCPX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 1.00 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.00 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.946 | 0.537 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 443M | 604M | 73% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.42 | 4.03 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.33 | 9.66 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.74 | 28.27 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.78 | 10.39 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 41.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement