Advertisement
BKBLF vs ICE
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKBLF is a Hold and ICE is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BKBLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileICE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BKBLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ICE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BKBLF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ICE’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BKBLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
- ICE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BKBLF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ICE (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -1.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.22%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.60%.
Reported Earning Dates
ICE is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.73% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Financial Publishing/Services (-1.40% weekly)The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
| BKBLF | ICE | BKBLF / ICE | |
| Capitalization | 3.21M | 99.8B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -1.48M | 6.4B | -0% |
| Gain YTD | 22.169 | 17.596 | 126% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 33.45 | - |
| Revenue | 240K | 12.6B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 32.4K | 2.64B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 427K | 19.7B | 0% |
BKBLF | ICE | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 68 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 73 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BKBLF's Valuation (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ICE (68) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that BKBLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ICE’s over the last 12 months.
ICE's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for BKBLF (100) in the null industry. This means that ICE’s stock grew significantly faster than BKBLF’s over the last 12 months.
ICE's SMR Rating (68) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as BKBLF (98) in the null industry. This means that ICE’s stock grew similarly to BKBLF’s over the last 12 months.
ICE's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as BKBLF (75) in the null industry. This means that ICE’s stock grew similarly to BKBLF’s over the last 12 months.
ICE's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as BKBLF (100) in the null industry. This means that ICE’s stock grew similarly to BKBLF’s over the last 12 months.
| BKBLF | ICE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 33% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 39% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 44% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 14% | 3 days ago 43% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 10% | 3 days ago 43% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 19 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 44% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 43% |
Advertisement
BKBLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BKBLF and EUXTF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BKBLF and EUXTF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BKBLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BKBLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| EUXTF - BKBLF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ICE - BKBLF | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.14% | ||
| BBKCF - BKBLF | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.98% | ||
| BOMXF - BKBLF | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.99% | ||
| CCORF - BKBLF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
ICE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICE has been loosely correlated with NDAQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ICE jumps, then NDAQ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICE | 100% | -0.14% | ||
| NDAQ - ICE | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| MCO - ICE | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| SPGI - ICE | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| MORN - ICE | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| TW - ICE | 51% Loosely correlated | -3.48% | ||
More | ||||