BKAHF
Price
$0.70
Change
+$0.03 (+4.48%)
Updated
Apr 8 closing price
Capitalization
5.44B
BKEAY
Price
$1.63
Change
-$0.04 (-2.40%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
4.07B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BKAHF vs BKEAY

Header iconBKAHF vs BKEAY Comparison
Open Charts BKAHF vs BKEAYBanner chart's image
Bank of Ayudhya Public
Price$0.70
Change+$0.03 (+4.48%)
Volume$729
Capitalization5.44B
Bank of East Asia
Price$1.63
Change-$0.04 (-2.40%)
Volume$9.14K
Capitalization4.07B
BKAHF vs BKEAY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BKEAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKAHF vs. BKEAY commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKAHF is a Buy and BKEAY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BKAHF: $0.70 vs. BKEAY: $1.63)
Brand notoriety: BKAHF and BKEAY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKAHF: 100% vs. BKEAY: 246%
Market capitalization -- BKAHF: $5.44B vs. BKEAY: $4.07B
BKAHF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $5.44B. BKEAY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKAHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBKEAY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BKAHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BKEAY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BKEAY is a better buy in the long-term than BKAHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BKEAY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BKEAY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

BKAHF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BKEAY (@Regional Banks) price change was +8.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKAHF($5.44B) has a higher market cap than BKEAY($4.07B). BKEAY has higher P/E ratio than BKAHF: BKEAY (7.52) vs BKAHF (5.59). BKEAY YTD gains are higher at: 39.367 vs. BKAHF (-12.472).
BKAHFBKEAYBKAHF / BKEAY
Capitalization5.44B4.07B134%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-12.47239.367-32%
P/E Ratio5.597.5274%
Revenue150BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt290BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKAHF vs BKEAY: Fundamental Ratings
BKAHF
BKEAY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
15
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6047
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5168
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BKEAY's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as BKAHF (14). This means that BKEAY’s stock grew similarly to BKAHF’s over the last 12 months.

BKEAY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BKAHF (100). This means that BKEAY’s stock grew similarly to BKAHF’s over the last 12 months.

BKAHF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as BKEAY (5). This means that BKAHF’s stock grew similarly to BKEAY’s over the last 12 months.

BKEAY's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as BKAHF (60). This means that BKEAY’s stock grew similarly to BKAHF’s over the last 12 months.

BKAHF's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as BKEAY (68). This means that BKAHF’s stock grew similarly to BKEAY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKAHFBKEAY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BKEAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GDXU136.6910.25
+8.11%
MicroSectors™ Gold Miners 3X Lvrgd ETN
EKG17.630.20
+1.15%
First Trust Nasdaq Lux Dgtl Hlth SoluETF
GAL48.480.13
+0.26%
SPDR® SSgA Global Allocation ETF
LEAD74.620.19
+0.26%
Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF
SJCP25.33N/A
N/A
SanJac Alpha Core Plus Bond ETF

BKAHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKAHF has been loosely correlated with BKQNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BKAHF jumps, then BKQNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKAHF
1D Price
Change %
BKAHF100%
N/A
BKQNY - BKAHF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
JFWV - BKAHF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRBK - BKAHF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.12%
FCPB - BKAHF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKEAY - BKAHF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BKEAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BKEAY and WTBFA have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BKEAY and WTBFA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKEAY
1D Price
Change %
BKEAY100%
N/A
WTBFA - BKEAY
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRFC - BKEAY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BHKLY - BKEAY
19%
Poorly correlated
+3.59%
BKHYY - BKEAY
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
BKAHF - BKEAY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More