Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIVSX vs NLSIX
BIVSX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts BIVSX vs NLSIX
Invenomic Super Institutional
Price$17.23
Change-$0.18 (-1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets947.41M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.25
Change-$0.13 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.32B
BIVSX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIVSX vs. NLSIX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIVSX is a Hold and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.32B vs. BIVSX (947M). BIVSX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: BIVSX (4.31) vs NLSIX (0.02). BIVSX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: BIVSX (6 years) vs NLSIX (13 years). BIVSX (2.92) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). BIVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 170.00 vs. NLSIX (48.00). NLSIX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIVSX: NLSIX (1000000) vs BIVSX (50000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.57 vs. BIVSX (1.53). BIVSX return over 5 years is better than : 68.85 vs. NLSIX (30.11).
| BIVSX | NLSIX | BIVSX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.92 | 1.32 | 221% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.92 | 1.32 | 221% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.823 | 2.667 | -68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000000 | 1000000 | 5,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 947M | 7.32B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.31 | 0.02 | 20,355% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.53 | 7.57 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | -27.34 | 19.84 | -138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.85 | 30.11 | 229% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 48.46 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers