Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIVSX vs NLSAX
BIVSX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts BIVSX vs NLSAX
Invenomic Super Institutional
Price$17.71
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.80
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.99B
BIVSX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIVSX vs. NLSAX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIVSX is a Buy and NLSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 8B vs. BIVSX (1.02B). BIVSX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: BIVSX (4.22) vs NLSAX (0.00). BIVSX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: BIVSX (7 years) vs NLSAX (14 years). BIVSX (2.92) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). BIVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 170.00 vs. NLSAX (48.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIVSX: NLSAX (1000) vs BIVSX (50000000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.74 vs. BIVSX (3.83). BIVSX return over 5 years is better than : 42.65 vs. NLSAX (19.78).
| BIVSX | NLSAX | BIVSX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.92 | 1.68 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.92 | 1.68 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.912 | 7.259 | 13% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000000 | 1000 | 5,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 8B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.22 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.83 | 6.74 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | -26.25 | 19.70 | -133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.65 | 19.78 | 216% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 56.79 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement