Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIVSX vs NLSAX
BIVSX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts BIVSX vs NLSAX
Invenomic Super Institutional
Price$17.76
Change+$0.42 (+2.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.06B
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.74
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.97B
BIVSX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIVSX vs. NLSAX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIVSX is a Buy and NLSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.97B vs. BIVSX (1.06B). BIVSX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: BIVSX (4.22) vs NLSAX (0.00). BIVSX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: BIVSX (7 years) vs NLSAX (14 years). BIVSX (2.92) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). BIVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 170.00 vs. NLSAX (48.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIVSX: NLSAX (1000) vs BIVSX (50000000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.02 vs. BIVSX (3.26). BIVSX return over 5 years is better than : 60.05 vs. NLSAX (21.23).
| BIVSX | NLSAX | BIVSX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.92 | 1.68 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.92 | 1.68 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.197 | 6.934 | 17% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000000 | 1000 | 5,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 7.97B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.22 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.26 | 6.02 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.12 | 28.66 | -21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.05 | 21.23 | 283% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 57.45 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement