Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIVSX vs NLSAX
BIVSX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts BIVSX vs NLSAX
Invenomic Super Institutional
Price$16.93
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets993.33M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.60
Change-$0.04 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.16B
BIVSX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIVSX vs. NLSAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIVSX is a Hold and NLSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 8.16B vs. BIVSX (993M). BIVSX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: BIVSX (2.50) vs NLSAX (0.00). BIVSX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: BIVSX (7 years) vs NLSAX (14 years). BIVSX (2.92) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). BIVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 197.00 vs. NLSAX (0.96). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIVSX: NLSAX (1000) vs BIVSX (50000000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.43 vs. BIVSX (0.66). BIVSX return over 5 years is better than : 46.73 vs. NLSAX (19.35).
| BIVSX | NLSAX | BIVSX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.92 | 1.68 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.92 | 1.68 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.682 | -0.609 | 934% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000000 | 1000 | 5,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 993M | 8.16B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.66 | 3.43 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | -18.29 | 25.30 | -72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.73 | 19.35 | 241% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 64.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement