Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIVSX vs CPCLX
BIVSX vs CPCLX Comparison
Open Charts BIVSX vs CPCLX
Invenomic Super Institutional
Price$18.42
Change-$0.12 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
Price$16.79
Change-$0.03 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
BIVSX vs CPCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIVSX vs. CPCLX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIVSX is a Hold and CPCLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPCLX (1.14B) and BIVSX (1.09B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . BIVSX pays higher dividends than CPCLX: BIVSX (3.97) vs CPCLX (2.80). BIVSX was incepted earlier than CPCLX: BIVSX (6 years) vs CPCLX (9 years). CPCLX (3.19) is less costly to investors than BIVSX (2.92). CPCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 342.00 vs. BIVSX (170.00). CPCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIVSX: CPCLX (2500) vs BIVSX (50000000). CPCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.58 vs. BIVSX (5.78). BIVSX return over 5 years is better than : 78.27 vs. CPCLX (56.50).
| BIVSX | CPCLX | BIVSX / CPCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.92 | 3.19 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.92 | 3.19 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.641 | 11.317 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000000 | 2500 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 1.14B | 96% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.97 | 2.80 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.78 | 9.58 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.71 | 22.21 | -75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.27 | 56.50 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement