Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIVSX vs CPCLX
BIVSX vs CPCLX Comparison
Open Charts BIVSX vs CPCLX
Invenomic Super Institutional
Price$17.54
Change+$0.49 (+2.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets983.81M
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
Price$16.22
Change-$0.04 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
BIVSX vs CPCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIVSX vs. CPCLX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIVSX is a Buy and CPCLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPCLX has more cash in the bank: 1.13B vs. BIVSX (984M). BIVSX pays higher dividends than CPCLX: BIVSX (4.53) vs CPCLX (2.89). BIVSX was incepted earlier than CPCLX: BIVSX (7 years) vs CPCLX (10 years). CPCLX (3.19) is less costly to investors than BIVSX (2.92). CPCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 342.00 vs. BIVSX (170.00). CPCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIVSX: CPCLX (2500) vs BIVSX (50000000). CPCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.58 vs. BIVSX (0.70). BIVSX return over 5 years is better than : 54.00 vs. CPCLX (34.04).
| BIVSX | CPCLX | BIVSX / CPCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.92 | 3.19 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.92 | 3.19 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.849 | 7.611 | -37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000000 | 2500 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 984M | 1.13B | 87% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.53 | 2.89 | 157% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.70 | 3.58 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | -28.94 | 17.73 | -163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.00 | 34.04 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement