Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIVSX vs CPCLX
BIVSX vs CPCLX Comparison
Open Charts BIVSX vs CPCLX
Invenomic Super Institutional
Price$16.93
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets993.33M
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
Price$15.86
Change-$0.66 (-4.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
BIVSX vs CPCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIVSX vs. CPCLX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIVSX is a Hold and CPCLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPCLX has more cash in the bank: 1.15B vs. BIVSX (993M). BIVSX pays higher dividends than CPCLX: BIVSX (2.50) vs CPCLX (0.52). BIVSX was incepted earlier than CPCLX: BIVSX (7 years) vs CPCLX (10 years). CPCLX (3.19) is less costly to investors than BIVSX (2.92). CPCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 347.00 vs. BIVSX (197.00). CPCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIVSX: CPCLX (2500) vs BIVSX (50000000). CPCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.62 vs. BIVSX (0.66). BIVSX return over 5 years is better than : 46.73 vs. CPCLX (23.51).
| BIVSX | CPCLX | BIVSX / CPCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.92 | 3.19 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.92 | 3.19 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.682 | 1.019 | -558% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000000 | 2500 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 993M | 1.15B | 86% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.50 | 0.52 | 479% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.66 | 1.62 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | -18.29 | 10.74 | -170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.73 | 23.51 | 199% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement