Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIVSX vs CPCLX
BIVSX vs CPCLX Comparison
Open Charts BIVSX vs CPCLX
Invenomic Super Institutional
Price$17.71
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
Price$16.32
Change+$0.09 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
BIVSX vs CPCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIVSX vs. CPCLX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIVSX is a Buy and CPCLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPCLX has more cash in the bank: 1.15B vs. BIVSX (1.02B). BIVSX pays higher dividends than CPCLX: BIVSX (4.22) vs CPCLX (2.92). BIVSX was incepted earlier than CPCLX: BIVSX (7 years) vs CPCLX (10 years). CPCLX (3.19) is less costly to investors than BIVSX (2.92). CPCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 342.00 vs. BIVSX (170.00). CPCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIVSX: CPCLX (2500) vs BIVSX (50000000). CPCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.54 vs. BIVSX (3.83). BIVSX return over 5 years is better than : 42.65 vs. CPCLX (26.34).
| BIVSX | CPCLX | BIVSX / CPCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.92 | 3.19 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.92 | 3.19 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.912 | 8.008 | 11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000000 | 2500 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 1.15B | 89% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.22 | 2.92 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.83 | 4.54 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | -26.25 | 15.83 | -166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.65 | 26.34 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement