Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIVRX vs NLSCX
BIVRX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts BIVRX vs NLSCX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.62
Change-$0.09 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.16B
BIVRX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIVRX vs. NLSCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIVRX is a Hold and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8.16B vs. BIVRX (963M). BIVRX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: BIVRX (1.99) vs NLSCX (0.00). BIVRX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: BIVRX (9 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). BIVRX (3.42) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). BIVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 197.00 vs. NLSCX (0.96). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIVRX: NLSCX (1000) vs BIVRX (5000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.65 vs. BIVRX (0.08). BIVRX return over 5 years is better than : 41.33 vs. NLSCX (14.66).
| BIVRX | NLSCX | BIVRX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.42 | 2.43 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.42 | 2.43 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.764 | -0.693 | 831% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 1000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 963M | 8.16B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.08 | 2.65 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.96 | 22.54 | -89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.33 | 14.66 | 282% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 52.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement