Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIVRX vs CPCLX
BIVRX vs CPCLX Comparison
Open Charts BIVRX vs CPCLX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
Price$15.86
Change-$0.66 (-4.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
BIVRX vs CPCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIVRX vs. CPCLX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIVRX is a Hold and CPCLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPCLX has more cash in the bank: 1.15B vs. BIVRX (963M). BIVRX pays higher dividends than CPCLX: BIVRX (1.99) vs CPCLX (0.52). BIVRX was incepted earlier than CPCLX: BIVRX (9 years) vs CPCLX (10 years). BIVRX (3.42) is less costly to investors than CPCLX (3.19). CPCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 347.00 vs. BIVRX (197.00). CPCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIVRX: CPCLX (2500) vs BIVRX (5000). CPCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.62 vs. BIVRX (0.08). BIVRX return over 5 years is better than : 41.33 vs. CPCLX (23.51).
| BIVRX | CPCLX | BIVRX / CPCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.42 | 3.19 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.42 | 3.19 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.764 | 1.019 | -566% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 963M | 1.15B | 83% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 0.52 | 382% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.08 | 1.62 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.96 | 10.74 | -186% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.33 | 23.51 | 176% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement