Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIVRX vs CPCLX
BIVRX vs CPCLX Comparison
Open Charts BIVRX vs CPCLX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
Price$16.82
Change+$0.09 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
BIVRX vs CPCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIVRX vs. CPCLX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIVRX is a Buy and CPCLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPCLX (1.14B) and BIVRX (1.09B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . BIVRX pays higher dividends than CPCLX: BIVRX (3.37) vs CPCLX (2.80). BIVRX was incepted earlier than CPCLX: BIVRX (8 years) vs CPCLX (9 years). BIVRX (3.42) is less costly to investors than CPCLX (3.19). CPCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 342.00 vs. BIVRX (170.00). CPCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIVRX: CPCLX (2500) vs BIVRX (5000). CPCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.58 vs. BIVRX (5.28). BIVRX return over 5 years is better than : 71.60 vs. CPCLX (56.50).
| BIVRX | CPCLX | BIVRX / CPCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.42 | 3.19 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.42 | 3.19 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.307 | 11.317 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 1.14B | 96% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.37 | 2.80 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.28 | 9.58 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | -18.90 | 22.21 | -85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.60 | 56.50 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement