Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIVIX vs NLSCX
BIVIX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts BIVIX vs NLSCX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.70
Change-$0.06 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.94B
BIVIX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIVIX vs. NLSCX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIVIX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.94B vs. BIVIX (1.01B). BIVIX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: BIVIX (3.98) vs NLSCX (0.00). BIVIX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: BIVIX (8 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). BIVIX (3.17) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). BIVIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 170.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIVIX: NLSCX (1000) vs BIVIX (50000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.80 vs. BIVIX (0.30). BIVIX return over 5 years is better than : 42.17 vs. NLSCX (15.10).
| BIVIX | NLSCX | BIVIX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.17 | 2.43 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.17 | 2.43 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.040 | 6.049 | -17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 1000 | 5,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 7.94B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.98 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.30 | 4.80 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | -28.77 | 16.89 | -170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.17 | 15.10 | 279% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 47.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement