Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIVIX vs NLSCX
BIVIX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts BIVIX vs NLSCX
Invenomic Institutional
Price$16.76
Change+$0.21 (+1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets968.68M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.72
Change-$0.09 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.99B
BIVIX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIVIX vs. NLSCX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIVIX is a Hold and NLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.99B vs. BIVIX (969M). BIVIX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: BIVIX (2.20) vs NLSCX (0.00). BIVIX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: BIVIX (9 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). BIVIX (3.17) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). BIVIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 170.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIVIX: NLSCX (1000) vs BIVIX (50000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.64 vs. BIVIX (-0.53). BIVIX return over 5 years is better than : 40.81 vs. NLSCX (17.08).
| BIVIX | NLSCX | BIVIX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.17 | 2.43 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.17 | 2.43 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.311 | -0.160 | 3,319% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 1000 | 5,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 969M | 7.99B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.53 | 5.64 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.94 | 23.52 | -68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.81 | 17.08 | 239% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 52.97 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers