Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIVIX vs NLSCX
BIVIX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts BIVIX vs NLSCX
Invenomic Institutional
Price$17.27
Change+$0.49 (+2.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets983.81M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.84
Change-$0.08 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.07B
BIVIX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIVIX vs. NLSCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIVIX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8.07B vs. BIVIX (984M). BIVIX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: BIVIX (4.28) vs NLSCX (0.00). BIVIX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: BIVIX (8 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). BIVIX (3.17) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). BIVIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 170.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIVIX: NLSCX (1000) vs BIVIX (50000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.56 vs. BIVIX (3.21). BIVIX return over 5 years is better than : 55.68 vs. NLSCX (16.09).
| BIVIX | NLSCX | BIVIX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.17 | 2.43 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.17 | 2.43 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.231 | 6.501 | -4% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 1000 | 5,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 984M | 8.07B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.21 | 6.56 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | -27.42 | 19.01 | -144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.68 | 16.09 | 346% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 46.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement