Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIVIX vs NLSCX
BIVIX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts BIVIX vs NLSCX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.55
Change-$0.07 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.12B
BIVIX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIVIX vs. NLSCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIVIX is a Hold and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8.12B vs. BIVIX (1.03B). BIVIX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: BIVIX (2.27) vs NLSCX (0.00). BIVIX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: BIVIX (9 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). BIVIX (3.17) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). BIVIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 197.00 vs. NLSCX (0.96). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIVIX: NLSCX (1000) vs BIVIX (50000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.65 vs. BIVIX (0.40). BIVIX return over 5 years is better than : 44.22 vs. NLSCX (14.66).
| BIVIX | NLSCX | BIVIX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.17 | 2.43 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.17 | 2.43 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.706 | -0.693 | 823% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 1000 | 5,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.03B | 8.12B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.27 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.40 | 2.65 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.08 | 22.54 | -85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.22 | 14.66 | 302% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 52.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement