Advertisement
BITQ vs MARA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BITQ is a Hold and MARA is a Hold.
MARA | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 85 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BITQ | MARA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 90% | 18 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CDEYX | 19.33 | 0.10 | +0.52% |
| Columbia Intrinsic Value Institutional 3 | |||
| HDGIX | 37.55 | 0.18 | +0.48% |
| Hartford Dividend and Growth I | |||
| BRUEX | 17.18 | 0.05 | +0.29% |
| MFS Blended Research Value Equity B | |||
| WHGSX | 20.15 | -0.03 | -0.15% |
| Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund Inst | |||
| PSCNX | 17.21 | -0.12 | -0.69% |
| Penn Capital Special Sits Sm Cp Eq Inst | |||
BITQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BITQ has been closely correlated with RIOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BITQ jumps, then RIOT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BITQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BITQ | 100% | -2.67% | ||
| RIOT - BITQ | 89% Closely correlated | -4.21% | ||
| HUT - BITQ | 84% Closely correlated | -4.96% | ||
| MARA - BITQ | 83% Closely correlated | -1.50% | ||
| CIFR - BITQ | 82% Closely correlated | -6.91% | ||
| IREN - BITQ | 81% Closely correlated | -2.93% | ||
More | ||||
MARA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MARA has been closely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MARA jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MARA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARA | 100% | -1.50% | ||
| CLSK - MARA | 83% Closely correlated | -5.09% | ||
| RIOT - MARA | 75% Closely correlated | -4.21% | ||
| BITF - MARA | 68% Closely correlated | -5.93% | ||
| BTBT - MARA | 68% Closely correlated | -3.73% | ||
| HIVE - MARA | 67% Closely correlated | -11.26% | ||
More | ||||