Advertisement
BITQ vs MARA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BITQ is a Hold and MARA is a Hold.
MARA | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BITQ | MARA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 90% | 14 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 3 days ago 85% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RTIYX | 11.88 | N/A | N/A |
| Russell Inv Multifactor Intl Eq Y | |||
| MRFOX | 33.10 | -0.09 | -0.27% |
| Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity | |||
| JFNSX | 62.75 | -0.38 | -0.60% |
| Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences S | |||
| BRWAX | 27.12 | -0.18 | -0.66% |
| MFS Blended Research Growth Eq A | |||
| RICGX | 64.41 | -0.51 | -0.79% |
| American Funds Invmt Co of Amer R6 | |||
BITQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BITQ has been closely correlated with RIOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BITQ jumps, then RIOT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BITQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BITQ | 100% | -3.53% | ||
| RIOT - BITQ | 89% Closely correlated | -6.27% | ||
| MARA - BITQ | 88% Closely correlated | -3.21% | ||
| HUT - BITQ | 85% Closely correlated | -3.10% | ||
| BITF - BITQ | 84% Closely correlated | -3.12% | ||
| CLSK - BITQ | 84% Closely correlated | -2.49% | ||
More | ||||
MARA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MARA has been closely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MARA jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MARA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARA | 100% | -3.21% | ||
| CLSK - MARA | 86% Closely correlated | -2.49% | ||
| RIOT - MARA | 81% Closely correlated | -6.27% | ||
| BITF - MARA | 77% Closely correlated | -3.12% | ||
| HIVE - MARA | 76% Closely correlated | -3.15% | ||
| CIFR - MARA | 71% Closely correlated | -7.79% | ||
More | ||||