BITF
Price
$1.32
Change
+$0.19 (+16.81%)
Updated
Jul 22 closing price
Capitalization
742.84M
26 days until earnings call
SLNHP
Price
$3.99
Change
-$0.06 (-1.48%)
Updated
Jul 22 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

BITF vs SLNHP

Header iconBITF vs SLNHP Comparison
Open Charts BITF vs SLNHPBanner chart's image
Bitfarms
Price$1.32
Change+$0.19 (+16.81%)
Volume$60.58M
Capitalization742.84M
Soluna Holdings
Price$3.99
Change-$0.06 (-1.48%)
Volume$1.3K
CapitalizationN/A
BITF vs SLNHP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BITF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLNHP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BITF vs. SLNHP commentary
Jul 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BITF is a Buy and SLNHP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BITF: $1.32 vs. SLNHP: $3.99)
Brand notoriety: BITF and SLNHP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BITF: 329% vs. SLNHP: 16%
Market capitalization -- BITF: $742.84M vs. SLNHP: $0
BITF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $742.84M. SLNHP’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BITF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLNHP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BITF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLNHP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLNHP is a better buy in the long-term than BITF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BITF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLNHP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BITF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SLNHP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLNHP is a better buy in the short-term than BITF.

Price Growth

BITF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +29.41% price change this week, while SLNHP (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +1.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

BITF is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.93% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BITF YTD gains are higher at: -11.409 vs. SLNHP (-55.667). BITF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -7.73M vs. SLNHP (-33.05M). BITF has more cash in the bank: 116M vs. SLNHP (5.63M). BITF has less debt than SLNHP: BITF (19.9M) vs SLNHP (21.4M). BITF has higher revenues than SLNHP: BITF (146M) vs SLNHP (15.1M).
BITFSLNHPBITF / SLNHP
Capitalization743MN/A-
EBITDA-7.73M-33.05M23%
Gain YTD-11.409-55.66720%
P/E Ratio10.38N/A-
Revenue146M15.1M967%
Total Cash116M5.63M2,062%
Total Debt19.9M21.4M93%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BITF: Fundamental Ratings
BITF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
26
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
89
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
74
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
41

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BITFSLNHP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BITF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLNHP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PGRSX9.820.13
+1.34%
Principal Global Real Estate Sec R6
RLCAX8.860.08
+0.91%
Columbia Disciplined Value A
RYFIX105.900.81
+0.77%
Rydex Financial Services Inv
WPVIX34.930.25
+0.72%
Weitz Multi Cap Equity-Institutional Cl
ATHDX31.110.04
+0.13%
American Century Heritage R6

BITF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BITF has been closely correlated with HIVE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BITF jumps, then HIVE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BITF
1D Price
Change %
BITF100%
+16.81%
HIVE - BITF
85%
Closely correlated
+10.13%
CLSK - BITF
82%
Closely correlated
+3.63%
RIOT - BITF
81%
Closely correlated
+1.78%
MARA - BITF
79%
Closely correlated
+5.58%
CIFR - BITF
76%
Closely correlated
+11.04%
More

SLNHP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLNHP and SLNH have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLNHP and SLNH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLNHP
1D Price
Change %
SLNHP100%
-1.48%
SLNH - SLNHP
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.10%
ARBK - SLNHP
17%
Poorly correlated
-2.93%
WULF - SLNHP
17%
Poorly correlated
+5.41%
BITF - SLNHP
12%
Poorly correlated
+16.81%
GREE - SLNHP
12%
Poorly correlated
+3.65%
More