BITF
Price
$1.23
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
742.84M
22 days until earnings call
SLNH
Price
$0.54
Change
-$0.03 (-5.26%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
7.66M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BITF vs SLNH

Header iconBITF vs SLNH Comparison
Open Charts BITF vs SLNHBanner chart's image
Bitfarms
Price$1.23
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$21.12M
Capitalization742.84M
Soluna Holdings
Price$0.54
Change-$0.03 (-5.26%)
Volume$1.53M
Capitalization7.66M
BITF vs SLNH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BITF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLNH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BITF vs. SLNH commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BITF is a Buy and SLNH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BITF: $1.23 vs. SLNH: $0.54)
Brand notoriety: BITF and SLNH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BITF: 112% vs. SLNH: 68%
Market capitalization -- BITF: $742.84M vs. SLNH: $7.66M
BITF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $742.84M. SLNH’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $7.66M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BITF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLNH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BITF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLNH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BITF and SLNH are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BITF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLNH’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BITF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLNH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BITF is a better buy in the short-term than SLNH.

Price Growth

BITF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +18.27% price change this week, while SLNH (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -14.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

BITF is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-2.06% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BITF($743M) has a higher market cap than SLNH($7.66M). BITF YTD gains are higher at: -17.450 vs. SLNH (-74.405). BITF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -7.73M vs. SLNH (-33.05M). BITF has more cash in the bank: 116M vs. SLNH (5.63M). BITF has less debt than SLNH: BITF (19.9M) vs SLNH (21.4M). BITF has higher revenues than SLNH: BITF (146M) vs SLNH (15.1M).
BITFSLNHBITF / SLNH
Capitalization743M7.66M9,695%
EBITDA-7.73M-33.05M23%
Gain YTD-17.450-74.40523%
P/E Ratio10.38N/A-
Revenue146M15.1M967%
Total Cash116M5.63M2,062%
Total Debt19.9M21.4M93%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BITF vs SLNH: Fundamental Ratings
BITF
SLNH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4618
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88100
SMR RATING
1..100
93100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4395
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10010
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
750

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BITF's Valuation (69) in the null industry is in the same range as SLNH (79). This means that BITF’s stock grew similarly to SLNH’s over the last 12 months.

BITF's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as SLNH (100). This means that BITF’s stock grew similarly to SLNH’s over the last 12 months.

BITF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as SLNH (100). This means that BITF’s stock grew similarly to SLNH’s over the last 12 months.

BITF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLNH (95). This means that BITF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLNH’s over the last 12 months.

SLNH's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BITF (100). This means that SLNH’s stock grew significantly faster than BITF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BITFSLNH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
90%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BITF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLNH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PFSZX26.260.13
+0.50%
PGIM Jennison Financial Services Z
FESAX10.570.04
+0.38%
First Eagle Small Cap Opportunity A
JGAVX88.010.31
+0.35%
JPMorgan US Value R3
RYLIX103.510.16
+0.15%
Rydex Leisure Inv
RAZCX11.230.01
+0.09%
Russell Inv Multi-Asset Strat C

BITF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BITF has been closely correlated with HIVE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BITF jumps, then HIVE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BITF
1D Price
Change %
BITF100%
N/A
HIVE - BITF
85%
Closely correlated
-5.42%
CLSK - BITF
82%
Closely correlated
-4.21%
RIOT - BITF
79%
Closely correlated
-1.02%
MARA - BITF
77%
Closely correlated
-0.06%
COIN - BITF
76%
Closely correlated
-1.27%
More

SLNH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLNH has been loosely correlated with BITF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLNH jumps, then BITF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLNH
1D Price
Change %
SLNH100%
-6.44%
BITF - SLNH
49%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CLSK - SLNH
48%
Loosely correlated
-4.21%
HIVE - SLNH
48%
Loosely correlated
-5.42%
MARA - SLNH
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
RIOT - SLNH
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.02%
More