BITF
Price
$1.65
Change
-$0.05 (-2.96%)
Updated
Dec 26, 01:29 PM (EDT)
83 days until earnings call
CLSK
Price
$10.66
Change
+$0.40 (+3.90%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
42 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BITF vs CLSK

Header iconBITF vs CLSK Comparison
Open Charts BITF vs CLSKBanner chart's image
Bitfarms
Price$1.65
Change-$0.05 (-2.96%)
Volume$15K
CapitalizationN/A
CleanSpark
Price$10.66
Change+$0.40 (+3.90%)
Volume$14.61M
CapitalizationN/A
BITF vs CLSK Comparison Chart
Loading...
BITF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BITF vs. CLSK commentary
Dec 26, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BITF is a Hold and CLSK is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2024
Stock price -- (BITF: $1.69 vs. CLSK: $10.66)
Brand notoriety: BITF and CLSK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BITF: 71% vs. CLSK: 37%
Market capitalization -- BITF: $742.84M vs. CLSK: $4.78B
BITF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $742.84M. CLSK’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $4.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BITF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLSK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BITF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BITF and CLSK are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BITF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BITF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

BITF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -18.36% price change this week, while CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -13.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +37.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

BITF is expected to report earnings on Mar 19, 2025.

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.90% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSK($4.78B) has a higher market cap than BITF($743M). CLSK YTD gains are higher at: -3.354 vs. BITF (-41.924). CLSK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 60.4M vs. BITF (-7.73M). CLSK has more cash in the bank: 176M vs. BITF (116M). CLSK has less debt than BITF: CLSK (15.2M) vs BITF (19.9M). CLSK has higher revenues than BITF: CLSK (216M) vs BITF (146M).
BITFCLSKBITF / CLSK
Capitalization743M4.78B16%
EBITDA-7.73M60.4M-13%
Gain YTD-41.924-3.3541,250%
P/E Ratio10.38N/A-
Revenue146M216M68%
Total Cash116M176M66%
Total Debt19.9M15.2M131%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSK: Fundamental Ratings
CLSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
59
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
85
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
86
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BITF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BITF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA462.2831.68
+7.36%
Tesla
AAPL258.202.93
+1.15%
Apple
SPY601.306.61
+1.11%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME31.140.24
+0.78%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X99299.195000623.101560
+0.63%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

BITF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BITF has been closely correlated with HIVE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BITF jumps, then HIVE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BITF
1D Price
Change %
BITF100%
+6.29%
HIVE - BITF
83%
Closely correlated
+5.39%
RIOT - BITF
80%
Closely correlated
+8.06%
CLSK - BITF
80%
Closely correlated
+3.90%
MARA - BITF
76%
Closely correlated
+4.68%
BTBT - BITF
75%
Closely correlated
+4.72%
More

CLSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSK has been closely correlated with RIOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSK jumps, then RIOT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLSK
1D Price
Change %
CLSK100%
+3.90%
RIOT - CLSK
84%
Closely correlated
+8.06%
MARA - CLSK
81%
Closely correlated
+4.68%
BITF - CLSK
80%
Closely correlated
+6.29%
HIVE - CLSK
77%
Closely correlated
+5.39%
CIFR - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
+5.57%
More