BITF
Price
$1.29
Change
+$0.04 (+3.20%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
707.93M
71 days until earnings call
CANG
Price
$5.04
Change
+$0.31 (+6.55%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
523.35M
85 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BITF vs CANG

Header iconBITF vs CANG Comparison
Open Charts BITF vs CANGBanner chart's image
Bitfarms
Price$1.29
Change+$0.04 (+3.20%)
Volume$17.88M
Capitalization707.93M
Cango
Price$5.04
Change+$0.31 (+6.55%)
Volume$1.02M
Capitalization523.35M
BITF vs CANG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BITF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BITF vs. CANG commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BITF is a Hold and CANG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BITF: $1.29 vs. CANG: $5.04)
Brand notoriety: BITF and CANG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BITF: 67% vs. CANG: 160%
Market capitalization -- BITF: $707.93M vs. CANG: $523.35M
BITF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $707.93M. CANG’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $523.35M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BITF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCANG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BITF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CANG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CANG is a better buy in the long-term than BITF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BITF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CANG’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BITF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CANG’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CANG is a better buy in the short-term than BITF.

Price Growth

BITF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -3.73% price change this week, while CANG (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +5.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

BITF is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2025.

CANG is expected to report earnings on Dec 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.73% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BITF($708M) has a higher market cap than CANG($523M). CANG YTD gains are higher at: 14.545 vs. BITF (-13.423). BITF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 25M vs. CANG (5.02M). CANG has more cash in the bank: 2.52B vs. BITF (144M). BITF has less debt than CANG: BITF (74.9M) vs CANG (834M). CANG has higher revenues than BITF: CANG (1.79B) vs BITF (246M).
BITFCANGBITF / CANG
Capitalization708M523M135%
EBITDA25M5.02M498%
Gain YTD-13.42314.545-92%
P/E RatioN/A11.43-
Revenue246M1.79B14%
Total Cash144M2.52B6%
Total Debt74.9M834M9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BITF vs CANG: Fundamental Ratings
BITF
CANG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7878
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8970
SMR RATING
1..100
9592
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5038
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10035
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BITF's Valuation (71) in the null industry is in the same range as CANG (73) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that BITF’s stock grew similarly to CANG’s over the last 12 months.

CANG's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as BITF (89) in the null industry. This means that CANG’s stock grew similarly to BITF’s over the last 12 months.

CANG's SMR Rating (92) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as BITF (95) in the null industry. This means that CANG’s stock grew similarly to BITF’s over the last 12 months.

CANG's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as BITF (50) in the null industry. This means that CANG’s stock grew similarly to BITF’s over the last 12 months.

CANG's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BITF (100) in the null industry. This means that CANG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BITF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BITFCANG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BITF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FEVAX23.690.16
+0.68%
First Eagle US A
VTCAX94.690.51
+0.54%
Vanguard Communication Svcs Idx Admiral
NUIIX30.880.16
+0.52%
Nuveen International Dividend Growth I
GSROX15.470.04
+0.26%
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Gr Insghts R
IDIVX20.090.03
+0.15%
Integrity Dividend Harvest A

BITF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BITF has been closely correlated with HIVE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BITF jumps, then HIVE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BITF
1D Price
Change %
BITF100%
+3.20%
HIVE - BITF
84%
Closely correlated
-1.85%
RIOT - BITF
79%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
MARA - BITF
77%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
COIN - BITF
76%
Closely correlated
-2.52%
CIFR - BITF
74%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
More

CANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CANG has been loosely correlated with MARA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CANG jumps, then MARA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CANG
1D Price
Change %
CANG100%
+6.55%
MARA - CANG
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
HUT - CANG
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
BITF - CANG
34%
Loosely correlated
+3.20%
CLSK - CANG
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.76%
BTBT - CANG
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
More