BIRK
Price
$37.49
Change
-$6.02 (-13.84%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.89B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RL
Price
$354.04
Change
+$31.11 (+9.63%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
21.47B
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BIRK vs RL

Header iconBIRK vs RL Comparison
Open Charts BIRK vs RLBanner chart's image
Birkenstock Holding
Price$37.49
Change-$6.02 (-13.84%)
Volume$2.7M
Capitalization6.89B
Ralph Lauren
Price$354.04
Change+$31.11 (+9.63%)
Volume$796.87K
Capitalization21.47B
BIRK vs RL Comparison Chart in %
BIRK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BIRK vs. RL commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIRK is a Buy and RL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (BIRK: $37.49 vs. RL: $354.04)
Brand notoriety: BIRK and RL are both not notable
BIRK represents the Wholesale Distributors, while RL is part of the Apparel/Footwear industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BIRK: 94% vs. RL: 133%
Market capitalization -- BIRK: $6.89B vs. RL: $21.47B
BIRK [@Wholesale Distributors] is valued at $6.89B. RL’s [@Apparel/Footwear] market capitalization is $21.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wholesale Distributors] industry ranges from $90.2B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry ranges from $31.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wholesale Distributors] industry is $7.5B. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry is $4.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BIRK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BIRK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RL is a better buy in the long-term than BIRK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BIRK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BIRK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BIRK and RL are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BIRK (@Wholesale Distributors) experienced а -2.34% price change this week, while RL (@Apparel/Footwear) price change was -1.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was -2.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.31%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was +1.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

BIRK is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

RL is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wholesale Distributors (-2.93% weekly)

Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.

@Apparel/Footwear (+1.72% weekly)

Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RL($21.5B) has a higher market cap than BIRK($6.9B). RL has higher P/E ratio than BIRK: RL (26.17) vs BIRK (16.99). RL YTD gains are higher at: 0.122 vs. BIRK (-8.337). RL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.34B vs. BIRK (627M). BIRK has less debt than RL: BIRK (1.34B) vs RL (2.87B). RL has higher revenues than BIRK: RL (7.57B) vs BIRK (2.03B).
BIRKRLBIRK / RL
Capitalization6.9B21.5B32%
EBITDA627M1.34B47%
Gain YTD-8.3370.122-6,856%
P/E Ratio16.9926.1765%
Revenue2.03B7.57B27%
Total Cash262MN/A-
Total Debt1.34B2.87B47%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RL: Fundamental Ratings
RL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
65
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
17
SMR RATING
1..100
27
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BIRKRL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BIRK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DVDN18.300.02
+0.09%
Kingsbarn Dividend Opportunity ETF
SLQD50.69N/A
-0.01%
iShares 0-5 Year Invmt Grade Corp Bd ETF
XDIV28.01-0.24
-0.84%
Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF
XDTE39.79-0.35
-0.87%
Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Cov Cll Strat ETF
MMLG33.60-0.81
-2.35%
First Trust Multi-Manager Large Gr ETF

BIRK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BIRK has been loosely correlated with RL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BIRK jumps, then RL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BIRK
1D Price
Change %
BIRK100%
+0.89%
RL - BIRK
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
DECK - BIRK
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.50%
ONON - BIRK
49%
Loosely correlated
-3.94%
WEYS - BIRK
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
VFC - BIRK
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.90%
More