BIRDF vs STN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIRDF is a Hold and STN is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BIRDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BIRDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- STN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
STN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- STN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BIRDF (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -7.58% price change this week, while STN (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -5.91% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -3.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.00%.
Reported Earning Dates
STN is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-3.81% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| BIRDF | STN | BIRDF / STN | |
| Capitalization | 1.01B | 9.15B | 11% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 62.308 | 1.185 | 5,260% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.24 | 37.08 | 41% |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
BIRDF | STN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 38 Fair valued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 50 | 62 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 52 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BIRDF's Valuation (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STN (87) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that BIRDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than STN’s over the last 12 months.
STN's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as BIRDF (9) in the null industry. This means that STN’s stock grew similarly to BIRDF’s over the last 12 months.
BIRDF's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as STN (62) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that BIRDF’s stock grew similarly to STN’s over the last 12 months.
BIRDF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as STN (54) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that BIRDF’s stock grew similarly to STN’s over the last 12 months.
BIRDF's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as STN (52) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that BIRDF’s stock grew similarly to STN’s over the last 12 months.
| STN | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 43% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 40% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% |
BIRDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BIRDF and STRL have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BIRDF and STRL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BIRDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIRDF | 100% | -4.26% | ||
| STRL - BIRDF | 23% Poorly correlated | -5.35% | ||
| STN - BIRDF | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.96% | ||
| ACA - BIRDF | 21% Poorly correlated | -5.64% | ||
| APG - BIRDF | 21% Poorly correlated | -4.46% | ||
| OBYCF - BIRDF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
STN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STN has been loosely correlated with FLR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STN jumps, then FLR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STN | 100% | -1.15% | ||
| FLR - STN | 40% Loosely correlated | -2.16% | ||
| BLNK - STN | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.25% | ||
| ROAD - STN | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| J - STN | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| APG - STN | 32% Poorly correlated | +3.25% | ||
More | ||||