Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIPIX vs RMQAX
BIPIX vs RMQAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIPIX vs. RMQAX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIPIX is a Hold and RMQAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMQAX has more cash in the bank: 954M vs. BIPIX (82.9M). RMQAX pays higher dividends than BIPIX: RMQAX (0.20) vs BIPIX (0.16). BIPIX was incepted earlier than RMQAX: BIPIX (25 years) vs RMQAX (11 years). RMQAX (1.82) is less costly to investors than BIPIX (1.56). RMQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1036.00 vs. BIPIX (196.00). RMQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIPIX: RMQAX (2500) vs BIPIX (15000). RMQAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.72 vs. BIPIX (-17.71). RMQAX return over 5 years is better than : 115.56 vs. BIPIX (-17.58).
| BIPIX | RMQAX | BIPIX / RMQAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.26 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.82 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.707 | 31.034 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 2500 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 82.9M | 954M | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.20 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.71 | 12.72 | -139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.99 | 199.84 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.58 | 115.56 | -15% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.10 | 1154.52 | -0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement