Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIPIX vs RMQAX
BIPIX vs RMQAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIPIX vs. RMQAX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIPIX is a Hold and RMQAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMQAX has more cash in the bank: 1.01B vs. BIPIX (187M). BIPIX pays higher dividends than RMQAX: BIPIX (0.34) vs RMQAX (0.00). BIPIX was incepted earlier than RMQAX: BIPIX (26 years) vs RMQAX (11 years). RMQAX (1.82) is less costly to investors than BIPIX (1.52). RMQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1036.00 vs. BIPIX (52.00). RMQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIPIX: RMQAX (2500) vs BIPIX (15000). BIPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 66.11 vs. RMQAX (2.15). RMQAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.16 vs. BIPIX (-1.47).
| BIPIX | RMQAX | BIPIX / RMQAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.26 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.82 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.736 | 1.532 | 374% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 2500 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 187M | 1.01B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 0.00 | 9,906% |
| Returns for 1 year | 66.11 | 2.15 | 3,082% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.83 | 118.03 | 13% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.47 | 50.16 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.57 | 1013.34 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement