BIPC
Price
$39.91
Change
+$0.17 (+0.43%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
4.78B
CGHOF
Price
$1.00
Change
+$0.07 (+7.53%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
5.45B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BIPC vs CGHOF

Header iconBIPC vs CGHOF Comparison
Open Charts BIPC vs CGHOFBanner chart's image
Brookfield Infrastructure
Price$39.91
Change+$0.17 (+0.43%)
Volume$358.5K
Capitalization4.78B
China Gas Holdings
Price$1.00
Change+$0.07 (+7.53%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization5.45B
BIPC vs CGHOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BIPC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CGHOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BIPC vs. CGHOF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIPC is a Hold and CGHOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BIPC: $39.91 vs. CGHOF: $1.00)
Brand notoriety: BIPC and CGHOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Gas Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BIPC: 64% vs. CGHOF: 82%
Market capitalization -- BIPC: $4.78B vs. CGHOF: $5.45B
BIPC [@Gas Distributors] is valued at $4.78B. CGHOF’s [@Gas Distributors] market capitalization is $5.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Gas Distributors] industry ranges from $29.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Gas Distributors] industry is $8.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BIPC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCGHOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BIPC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CGHOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGHOF is a better buy in the long-term than BIPC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BIPC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CGHOF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BIPC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CGHOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CGHOF is a better buy in the short-term than BIPC.

Price Growth

BIPC (@Gas Distributors) experienced а -0.77% price change this week, while CGHOF (@Gas Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Gas Distributors industry was -0.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.06%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Gas Distributors (-0.70% weekly)

Gas distributors are involved in moving and selling gas – from wellheads or over-distribution systems operated by other firms – to residential and non-residential customers. These companies perform tasks such as the gathering and processing of gas, intrastate and interstate transport, and delivery to the customer. Some of the biggest gas distributing companies in the U.S. include Sempra Energy, Avangrid Inc and Atmos Energy Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGHOF($5.45B) has a higher market cap than BIPC($4.78B). CGHOF has higher P/E ratio than BIPC: CGHOF (13.00) vs BIPC (4.15). CGHOF YTD gains are higher at: 17.647 vs. BIPC (3.032). CGHOF has more cash in the bank: 9.23B vs. BIPC (68M). BIPC has less debt than CGHOF: BIPC (12.2B) vs CGHOF (60.6B).
BIPCCGHOFBIPC / CGHOF
Capitalization4.78B5.45B88%
EBITDAN/A6.96B-
Gain YTD3.03217.64717%
P/E Ratio4.1513.0032%
RevenueN/A80.5B-
Total Cash68M9.23B1%
Total Debt12.2B60.6B20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGHOF: Fundamental Ratings
CGHOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
46
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
33
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BIPCCGHOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BIPC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CGHOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ITM46.020.29
+0.65%
VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF
AFSC30.34N/A
N/A
abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF
EVX39.22-0.25
-0.62%
VanEck Environmental Svcs ETF
ATMP28.50-0.22
-0.75%
Barclays ETN+ Select MLP
BPAY32.32-0.33
-1.02%
iShares FinTech Active ETF

BIPC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BIPC has been loosely correlated with NWN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BIPC jumps, then NWN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BIPC
1D Price
Change %
BIPC100%
+0.43%
NWN - BIPC
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
NJR - BIPC
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
OGS - BIPC
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
MDU - BIPC
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
SWX - BIPC
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
More

CGHOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CGHOF and OPAL have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGHOF and OPAL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGHOF
1D Price
Change %
CGHOF100%
N/A
OPAL - CGHOF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.80%
APAJF - CGHOF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGHLY - CGHOF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NFE - CGHOF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+4.26%
BIPC - CGHOF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
More