Advertisement
BIOYF vs BKUH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIOYF is a Hold and BKUH is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BIOYF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBKUH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BIOYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- BKUH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BIOYF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- BIOYF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BIOYF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а -2.92% price change this week, while BKUH (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was -1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +24.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +66.99%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (-1.16% weekly)A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.
| BIOYF | BKUH | BIOYF / BKUH | |
| Capitalization | 95.3M | 6.03M | 1,581% |
| EBITDA | 12M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.781 | 33.333 | 29% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.42 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 39.5M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 20.4M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 942K | N/A | - |
BIOYF | BKUH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BKUH's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as BIOYF (26). This means that BKUH’s stock grew similarly to BIOYF’s over the last 12 months.
BIOYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BKUH (100). This means that BIOYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BKUH’s over the last 12 months.
BIOYF's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BKUH (100). This means that BIOYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BKUH’s over the last 12 months.
BIOYF's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as BKUH (62). This means that BIOYF’s stock grew similarly to BKUH’s over the last 12 months.
BIOYF's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BKUH (100). This means that BIOYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BKUH’s over the last 12 months.
| BIOYF | BKUH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 40% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 37% | 3 days ago 37% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 40% | 3 days ago 36% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 46% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 40% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 35% | N/A |
Advertisement
BIOYF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BIOYF and AVCNF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BIOYF and AVCNF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BIOYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIOYF | 100% | -1.29% | ||
| AVCNF - BIOYF | 9% Poorly correlated | +4.68% | ||
| BUDZ - BIOYF | 7% Poorly correlated | +8.33% | ||
| BIOVF - BIOYF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BIOGY - BIOYF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BKUH - BIOYF | -1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
BKUH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BKUH and HSTI have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BKUH and HSTI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BKUH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BKUH | 100% | N/A | ||
| HSTI - BKUH | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BSPK - BKUH | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BUDZ - BKUH | 2% Poorly correlated | +8.33% | ||
| BIOGY - BKUH | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AVCNF - BKUH | 0% Poorly correlated | +4.68% | ||
More | ||||