Advertisement
BIOVF vs BKUH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIOVF is a Hold and BKUH is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BIOVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBKUH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BIOVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- BKUH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BIOVF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BKUH’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BIOVF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- BKUH’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
BIOVF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BKUH (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +92.60%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+2.02% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
| BIOVF | BKUH | BIOVF / BKUH | |
| Capitalization | 5.81B | 298M | 1,948% |
| EBITDA | 6.96B | -18.17M | -38,306% |
| Gain YTD | 5.748 | 33.333 | 17% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.92 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 20.1B | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 790M | 569 | 138,840,070% |
| Total Debt | 28.2B | 6.7M | 420,958% |
BIOVF | BKUH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 52 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 65 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BKUH's Valuation (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BIOVF (83). This means that BKUH’s stock grew significantly faster than BIOVF’s over the last 12 months.
BIOVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BKUH (100). This means that BIOVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BKUH’s over the last 12 months.
BIOVF's SMR Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BKUH (100). This means that BIOVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BKUH’s over the last 12 months.
BKUH's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as BIOVF (58). This means that BKUH’s stock grew similarly to BIOVF’s over the last 12 months.
BIOVF's P/E Growth Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as BKUH (100). This means that BIOVF’s stock grew similarly to BKUH’s over the last 12 months.
| BIOVF | BKUH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 43% | 4 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 40% | 4 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 42% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 39% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 43% | 4 days ago 39% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 47% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
BIOVF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BIOVF and SFOSF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BIOVF and SFOSF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BIOVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIOVF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SFOSF - BIOVF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BIOYF - BIOVF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BOIRF - BIOVF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ARSUF - BIOVF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BKUH - BIOVF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
BKUH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BKUH and HSTI have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BKUH and HSTI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BKUH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BKUH | 100% | N/A | ||
| HSTI - BKUH | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BSPK - BKUH | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BUDZ - BKUH | 2% Poorly correlated | -2.88% | ||
| BIOGY - BKUH | 1% Poorly correlated | +5.57% | ||
| AVCNF - BKUH | 0% Poorly correlated | -2.21% | ||
More | ||||