Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIOPX vs RGAHX
BIOPX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts BIOPX vs RGAHX
Baron Opportunity Retail
Price$52.66
Change+$0.35 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.65B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$83.30
Change+$0.28 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
BIOPX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIOPX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIOPX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. BIOPX (1.65B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than BIOPX: RGAHX (0.47) vs BIOPX (0.00). BIOPX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: BIOPX (25 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). BIOPX (1.31) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). BIOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIOPX: RGAHX (250) vs BIOPX (2000). BIOPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.63 vs. RGAHX (17.89). BIOPX return over 5 years is better than : 70.09 vs. RGAHX (49.57).
| BIOPX | RGAHX | BIOPX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.44 | 298% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.44 | 298% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.733 | 13.426 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.65B | 328B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.63 | 17.89 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 102.38 | 58.90 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.09 | 49.57 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.58 | N/A | - |